Our Health Policy Matters

It is never easy to absorb unpleasant information. And when I was a policymaker, if someone told me that my decisions were going to cost innocent people their lives, then I usually chalked it up either to hyper-sensationalism or hyperbole.  After all, would passing a small increase in a business tax really force an employer to imperil workers by cutting corners on safety?  Would gun registration really leave a homeowner defenseless in the case of a break-in? Would cutting back welfare a few dollars actually result in a choice between eating or heating in the winter? In most instances, it was hard to see the direct connection. But the more I learned about health issues, the more I understood that there really were some decisions that were a matter of life and death.  These were the issues that taught me humility.  These were the issues that taught me that I needed to set aside my political ideology and embrace both theology and hard data whenever...

It is never easy to absorb unpleasant information. And when I was a policymaker, if someone told me that my decisions were going to cost innocent people their lives, then I usually chalked it up either to hyper-sensationalism or hyperbole.  After all, would passing a small increase in a business tax really force an employer to imperil workers by cutting corners on safety?  Would gun registration really leave a homeowner defenseless in the case of a break-in? Would cutting back welfare a few dollars actually result in a choice between eating or heating in the winter? In most instances, it was hard to see the direct connection. But the more I learned about health issues, the more I understood that there really were some decisions that were a matter of life and death.  These were the issues that taught me humility.  These were the issues that taught me that I needed to set aside my political ideology and embrace both theology and hard data whenever...

As we gaze this week at the wonderland we call Congress, it might amaze us that Congress actually shut down the federal government over the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. Rep. John Culberson of Texas grinned like a Cheshire Cat as he explained it this way in an outlandish interview on CNN, “we do not want the federal government socializing health care as they have in England and in France.” This is socialized medicine?  Really? He wasn’t content to leave it there, adding a new “sacred” right to the Constitution to explain further his position. “The right to be left alone as Americans is probably our most important right.” As the Mad Hatter would say, “Why, you might just as well say that ‘I see what I eat is the same as I eat what I see.’”  But Representative Culberson was on a roll.  Literally.  This was two days after he was reported to have shouted “let’s roll!” as House Republicans concluded a caucus in which they re-affir...

As we gaze this week at the wonderland we call Congress, it might amaze us that Congress actually shut down the federal government over the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. Rep. John Culberson of Texas grinned like a Cheshire Cat as he explained it this way in an outlandish interview on CNN, “we do not want the federal government socializing health care as they have in England and in France.” This is socialized medicine?  Really? He wasn’t content to leave it there, adding a new “sacred” right to the Constitution to explain further his position. “The right to be left alone as Americans is probably our most important right.” As the Mad Hatter would say, “Why, you might just as well say that ‘I see what I eat is the same as I eat what I see.’”  But Representative Culberson was on a roll.  Literally.  This was two days after he was reported to have shouted “let’s roll!” as House Republicans concluded a caucus in which they re-affir...

President Reagan gave his first speech on the AIDS epidemic almost twenty-five years ago on May 31, 1987.  This was after 36,058 Americans had been diagnosed with AIDS, 20,849 had died, and over a quarter of a million had been infected with HIV. For years, he had been criticized for ignoring and underfunding the worst public health crisis of the late 20 th century.   So he began his speech with a joke: “A charity committee approaches the wealthiest man in town for a contribution.  ‘Our book shows that you haven’t contributed any money this year,’ they tell him.  ‘Does your book also show that I have an infirm mother and a disabled brother?’ he replies.  ‘Why no,’ they say, ‘we didn’t know that.’ ‘Well, I don’t give them any money.  Why should I give any to you?’” The bad joke was an inadvertent punctuation mark on a presidency too fondly remembered by both republicans and democrats today. On matters of health, Reagan took us ...

President Reagan gave his first speech on the AIDS epidemic almost twenty-five years ago on May 31, 1987.  This was after 36,058 Americans had been diagnosed with AIDS, 20,849 had died, and over a quarter of a million had been infected with HIV. For years, he had been criticized for ignoring and underfunding the worst public health crisis of the late 20 th century.   So he began his speech with a joke: “A charity committee approaches the wealthiest man in town for a contribution.  ‘Our book shows that you haven’t contributed any money this year,’ they tell him.  ‘Does your book also show that I have an infirm mother and a disabled brother?’ he replies.  ‘Why no,’ they say, ‘we didn’t know that.’ ‘Well, I don’t give them any money.  Why should I give any to you?’” The bad joke was an inadvertent punctuation mark on a presidency too fondly remembered by both republicans and democrats today. On matters of health, Reagan took us ...