A person who was unhappy with the outcome of the election suggested that the voters gave President Obama a “Mulligan” on election day – a second chance to do things right. That’s one way to look at it. But if you belief that, then you also have to say the same thing about the divided Congress – it, too, was being given at least one more chance to get things right. That means agreeing to the surprisingly little compromise on which the future of Medicare will depend. It’s hard to understand how two sides looking at the same reality and sharing the same goals could be so far apart in coming to an agreement about what to do. Nowhere is this more evident than in the Medicare program debate. Both sides acknowledge that Medicare is as popular as any entitlement, is as well run as any health insurance program, and addresses a need that is only going to grow in the coming years. They also agree on certain facts. The first is that Medicare hasn’t yet cont...
An occasional column focusing on federal, state, and local health policy