Skip to main content

The Ten Worst States for Your Health, 2013

Arkansas supplants Oklahoma in the 2013 OHPM rankings as the worst state for your health. 

Arkansas was joined in the bottom ten by five other southern states and four states from the west.  And here's all you need to know about why states in the bottom ten are bad for your health.  Life expectancy in those states is the same as it is in Paraguay - 76.6 years.  This is four years fewer, or an entire Presidential term less, than life expectancy in Massachusetts and Connecticut - the two states at the top of this year's ranking.

Two states – Texas (39, up two places from last year) and West Virginia (38, up five places from last year) – escaped the bottom ten this year.  Kentucky found its way back after one year in 35th place, and South Carolina entered the bottom ten after dropping eight places from 40th last year. 


Here are the bottom ten, with the change from last year in parentheses:

41. Kentucky (-6).   Kentucky entered the bottom ten this year not because it did poorly in most rankings (its 44th place healthy state ranking was its only bottom ten finish), but because it places in the bottom half in every category except Medicaid access.

42. Alabama (+3).  If Alabama’s 35th place Kids Count health ranking can help to improve its 45th place healthy state ranking in the future, then it may be poised to escape the bottom ten in the next couple of years.

43. Oklahoma (+7).  Oklahoma moved up from last place this year on the basis of a top 15 performance in Medicaid access and per capita Medicare community spending.  But 43rd place finishes in both the Healthy State and Kids Count Health rankings cemented its position in the bottom ten.

44. Louisiana (0).  Louisiana is top ten in Medicare community spending and percentage of people on Medicaid, but bottom ten in the Healthy State rankings, the Kids Count health rankings, access to primary care providers, and the percentage of people with employer-based health insurance.

45. New Mexico (+4).  New Mexico is 5th in percentage of people on Medicaid, and 50th in percentage of people with employer-based insurance.  Not exactly an indication of a “worker-friendly” environment.

46. Montana (-5). Montana is last in the Kids Count health rankings, and next-to-last in the percentage of people with private health insurance and Medicare community spending.  These offset its middle-of-the-pack healthy state ranking (29th).

47. Mississippi (0).  At least Mississippi is consistent, finishing 48th, 47th, and 47th during the last three years.  Although it boasts top ten rankings in Medicaid access and Medicare community spending, it is 45th in employer-based insurance, 48th in the Kids Count health rankings, and 49th in the Healthy State rankings.  Mississippi has downside potential.  It hasn’t embraced Obamacare Medicaid expansion.  But both Arkansas and Nevada – the bottom two states in the rankings - have.

48. South Carolina (-8). South Carolina’s dive in the rankings is attributable to the fact that it doesn’t do well in any of the categories. In fact, its highest ranking among the states is only 20th in Medicare community services spending.

49. Nevada (-1). Nevada’s only top thirty ranking is in Medicare community spending.  It is 47th in the Kids Count health rankings and number of high-quality hospital programs.  But it is one of four bottom ten states to embrace Medicaid expansion.

50. Arkansas (-4).  What is Arkansas’ recipe for failure? Start with a 48th place Healthy State ranking.  Add in a 49th place finish in access to primary care providers, a 46th place ranking in the percentage of people with employer-based health insurance, and a 44th place finish in number of high quality hospital programs. Arkansas ranks in the top ten in just one indicator.  It is 9th in the percentage of people on Medicaid.  Of course, that’s a pre-ACA percentage, but it may explain why Arkansas – a conservative state – has embraced Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion.

Some interesting notes:

Colorado has the greatest difference in the two prevention rankings – it is 11th in the healthy state rankings, and just 42nd in the Kids Count health rankings.

Hawaii (+23.8) and Vermont (+22.5) are the only two states that rank more than twenty places better on the average of their prevention rankings than on the average of their health care rankings.  Rhode Island (+17.9) and New Hampshire (+17.9) tie for third on this measure.

Mississippi (-22.9) and Louisiana (-20.6) are the only two states that rank more than twenty places worse on the average of their prevention rankings than on the average of their health care rankings.  Tennessee (-18.6) is third on this measure. 

The states that are most balanced in their prevention and health care rankings are Kansas (+0.6), Colorado (+0.5), and Montana (-0.7).

Connecticut (2nd overall) favors prevention and public health (+8.2, on average), and Florida (34th overall) favors health care (-11.9, on average).

To see the full rankings, click here.

Paul Gionfriddo via email: gionfriddopaul@gmail.com.  Twitter: @pgionfriddo.  Facebook: www.facebook.com/paul.gionfriddo.  LinkedIn:  www.linkedin.com/in/paulgionfriddo/
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

States and Rebates

If you run a small business in Florida, are self-employed in Texas, or work for a large corporation in New Jersey ( see an update below ), then your state insurance regulators probably haven't been working for you. The news that 15.8 million people can expect $1.3 billion in rebates from insurers this year because of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) underscores how weak health insurance regulation has been in states across the country.  It may come as no surprise that Florida and Texas, two leaders in the fight against ACA, have been exposed as anti-consumer.  But they are not the only states with an anti-consumer bias. First, the good news: last week, the federal government announced that three-quarters of us will get letters beginning on July 1 telling us that our insurance plans paid out at least 80 to 85 cents in benefits for every premium dollar they collected. This means that under ACA they met the minimum standard for a reasonable benefit payout (which i...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Ten Best and Ten Worst States for Your Mental Health

Connecticut spends four times more per capita on state mental health services than Texas.  In Florida, 25 percent fewer people report having mental illnesses than in Washington. Across the nation, there are significant differences in the amounts states spend on mental health services.  Connecticut spends $189 per capita, while Texas spends only $39. But there are also significant differences in the reported prevalence of mental illnesses.  For example, fewer than 18 percent of Floridians report having a mental illness during the past year, but in Washington almost 24 percent do. But what happens when you put spending and prevalence together?  Some new rankings emerge that give you a measure of each state’s real commitment to protecting mental health – and treating mental illness – in their population.  This week, I have ranked all fifty states using both spending and prevalence data.       I have taken per capita m...
12 comments
Read more

Why the Republicans Have No Health Care Plan

There's a simple reason why (after more than a decade) Donald Trump and the Republicans have no plan to replace Obamacare. I'll explain in a few minutes. But first, some background. When the Affordable Care Act (or Obamacare) was passed in 2010, it was an effort to expand health care coverage to a lot of people who needed it, while controlling their costs. It had certain key provisions, not the least of which were that people couldn't be denied coverage for pre-existing conditions, that all chronic diseases needed to be covered fairly, and lifetime coverage caps had to be lifted. The problem was that if you left matters to insurers to set insurance premiums based on what this would cost, the price of insurance would rise dramatically. So the government took a look at three different programs and ultimately put them together into one system. For people whose income was so low that they couldn't afford any real cost-sharing, the government expanded Medicaid. For elders...
Post a Comment
Read more