Skip to main content

Mitt's Plan


Imagine what a nightmare healthcare scenario might look like.

You are diagnosed with a debilitating chronic disease while young.  At first, you canā€™t even work because of it, and you are dependent on a family memberā€™s insurance to help pay your medical expenses. 

Eventually, your disease goes into remission, and you find a job with health insurance.  You go off your family memberā€™s plan.  But your employer goes bankrupt, and youā€™re left with no job and no insurance. 

Then you get another chronic disease.

You try the individual health insurance market, but the only insurance available to you comes from a high risk pool in which everyone else also has at least one chronic disease.  The price is outrageous, but you pay the bill as long as you can.

Eventually, you canā€™t afford it, and you become uninsured for a few months. 

You apply to your stateā€™s Medicaid program for help.  You are denied because your state has already spent all the Medicaid dollars the federal government has given it for the year. 

You keep searching for work.  When you finally land a new job, you are informed by your employer that it only offers a high-deductible, catastrophic-only insurance plan.  You have to cover your basic health care needs, including annual physicals, prescription drugs, and counseling, out-of-pocket. 

At least, you think, the plan will help with recurrences of your chronic conditions.

But then you learn that as a result of your earlier lapse in coverage, the companyā€™s insurer refuses to cover you because of your pre-existing condition.

Youā€™re out of luck.

You might call this nightmare far-fetched.

Or you could call it Mittā€™s Plan.

Mitt Romney now has a plan to repeal the Affordable Care Act if he is elected President. 

These are some of the mandates with which he would replace it:

  • High risk pools for the chronically ill.  These high-cost, unsubsidized private insurance plans for the sickest among us have been around for years, but have never enrolled many people because of their prohibitive costs.
  • A law to prevent insurance discrimination against people with pre-existing conditions only if they maintain continuous coverage.  If they ever have a lapse in insurance for any reason, insurers could use that lapse to deny insurance to them forever.  Eventually, this could affect nearly everyone, because over one-quarter of the population has a lapse in coverage every year
  • A return of states to ā€œtheir proper place of regulating local insurance marketsā€ ā€“ but this would be accompanied by a new federal mandate that would gut state regulatory authority.  The federal government would mandate that out-of-state insurers could sell policies in a state that donā€™t meet the minimum standards set by that state.
  • A Medicaid block grant to the states.  This will cap federal Medicaid spending each year.  States will be forced either to pay a larger share of long-term and indigent care costs or to cap both Medicaid payments and enrollment.
  • More managed care and fewer ā€œfee-for-serviceā€ plans.  Private insurers will be given even more power over patients and doctors to decide who is worthy of care and who isnā€™t ā€“ and no level of government will have the authority to put an end to this rationing of care in the interest of the consumer.

The resulting nightmare isnā€™t far-fetched.  Candace Brown is already living most of it every day


Candace Brown is a nurse.  She was diagnosed with Crohnā€™s Disease when she was 30.  She wasnā€™t able to work for three years, but was covered on her fatherā€™s insurance.  Her disease finally went into remission, and she found a job with health insurance.  However, she lost both the job and her insurance when the company went out of business.

Then she was diagnosed with depression, and struggled to find insurance afterwards because of her two pre-existing conditions.  She finally found a plan that would accept her, but it now costs $1,200 a month. 

She describes herself as ā€œfinancially drained.ā€

I imagine she sometimes feels physically drained as well.

At least she hasnā€™t yet had to deal with being uninsured, but even that hasnā€™t come without stress.  Sheā€™s afraid to let her coverage lapse to qualify for the Pre-existing Condition Insurance Program (PCIP) - which Romney also would repeal.

The only nightmares Candace has avoided so far ā€“ because they wonā€™t be legal unless Mittā€™s Plan becomes law ā€“ is a non-entitlement Medicaid long term care program someday and being dumped by her current insurer.

But Candace is a realist, and thatā€™s why she is counting the days until ACA takes full effect.  

Note: Candace Brown's story was published and made available by Florida CHAIN at the link provided in the column.  More information about the work of Florida CHAIN can be found using the link.  If you have questions about this column or wish to receive an email notifying you when new Our Health Policy Matters columns are published, please email gionfriddopaul@gmail.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

For the Health of Our Community, Can We Plan More in Advance?

Mayor Florsheim has proposed a budget with a 2.7 mill increase for the coming fiscal year. This will mean an increase in taxes of approximately $500 per year for a home with a market value (not an assessed value) of $250,000, with larger increases for many homes in our city. While I appreciate the time and effort that went into his budget calculation, like many people I donā€™t believe that this is a sustainable increase on top of the increases of the past few years. What I appreciate even more is that the Mayor has invited members of the public to work together to offer their own perspective and suggestions to the City Council. In the past few weeks, I have offered several short-term suggestions, including a job freeze, a search for an alternative health insurance provider, and greater advocacy at the state level for fairer PILOT funding for Middletown. As an example, the Mayorā€™s budget proposes $77,800 for a Grantwriter versus zero from the Finance Department. Maybe we wait on that? ...

Veterans and Mental Illness

On a sultry June morning in our nationalā€™s capital last Friday, I visited the Vietnam Veterans Memorial .   Scores of people moved silently along the Wall, viewing the names of the men and women who died in that war.   Some stopped and took pictures.   One group of men about my age surrounded one name for a photo.   Two young women posed in front of another, perhaps a grandfather or great uncle they never got to meet. It is always an incredibly moving experience to visit the Wall.   It treats each of the people it memorializes with respect. There is no rank among those honored.   Officer or enlisted, rich or poor, each is given equal space and weight. It is a form of acknowledgement and respect for which many veterans still fight. Brave Vietnam veterans returned from Southeast Asia to educate our nation about the effects of war and violence. I didnā€™t know anything about Post Traumatic Stress Disorder when I entered the Connecticut Legislature in the...

Scapegoats and Concepts of a Plan: How Trump Fails Us

When a politician says he has ā€œconcepts of a planā€ instead of a plan, there is no plan. And yet, thatā€™s where we are with Donald Trump, nine years after he first launched a political campaign promising to replace Obamacare with something cheaper and better, nearly four years after he had four years to try to do just that. And fail. Doubling down during Tuesdayā€™s debate, he claimed he had ā€œconcepts of a planā€ to replace Obamacare. Really? Heā€™s got nothing. In fact, he sounds just like Nixon sounded in 1968, when he claimed he had a ā€œsecretā€ plan to get us out of Vietnam. That turned out to be no plan at all (remember ā€œVietnamization?ā€) and cost us seven more years there and tens of thousands of lives. The Affordable Care Act, about which I wrote plenty in this blog a decade or more ago, wasnā€™t perfect. But it was a whole lot better than what we had before it ā€“ and anything (save a public option) that has been proposed since. Back then, insurers could deny coverage because of pre-exi...