Skip to main content

Why Research Matters


A few weeks ago, we were tantalized by the news that a new treatment for leukemia might be on the horizon. 
Three very sick patients were injected with a new drug.  It was made from ā€“ of all things ā€“ a modified version of the virus that causes AIDS.  After a year, two were disease-free and the third had a 70% reduction in disease tissue.  One researcher was quoted as saying that the results ā€œexceeded our wildest expectations.ā€

But the rest of the story pointed out that the discovery almost didnā€™t happen.  There wasnā€™t enough research money for a full trial.  Neither the National Cancer Institute nor pharmaceutical companies had funding for the research.  A family foundation stepped up, but thatā€™s why there were only enough funds for three patients to participate initially.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the largest funder of biomedical research in the United States.  In requesting a budget of $32 billion for FY2012, it noted that research that it funded has reduced death rates from stroke by 70% and deaths from coronary heart disease by 60% since 1970.  It has also contributed to the amazing results that have been achieved over the last twenty years in HIV/AIDS management, and to a significant reduction in cancer deaths as well.

We spend $2.4 trillion on health care in America.  Shortly after NIH made this request for just over 1% of that, Congress cut its funding to $250 million below 2010 levels. 
On its cover, the AARP Magazine for September/October 2011 trumpets ā€œAmazing Medical Discoveries That Will Change Your Life.ā€  These discoveries were the result of funded research.  They include artificial retinas, prostate cancer vaccines, and magnets for depression relief ā€“ all currently available.  AARP sees new breast cancer drugs and adult stem cells for coronary artery disease treatment in just a few years, and even more exotic treatments down the road.

These discoveries will all make a huge difference in how we live.
Research isnā€™t just the work of scientists in labs, and doesnā€™t just result in new drugs and treatments.  Sometimes, it results in safer medical procedures that not only preserve life, but also lower costs at the same time.

NIH says that research advances have saved trillions of dollars.
Hereā€™s one story of money-saving research advances.  Jeffrey B. Cooper, a biomedical engineer at Massachusetts General Hospital, has made patient safety his lifeā€™s work.  Though he has labored in relative obscurity ā€“ I doubt that more than a thimble full of policy leaders outside of the Greater Boston area have ever heard of him ā€“ he played a key role in the development of modern anesthesia ā€œstandard of practiceā€ guidelines, developed technology to manage the use of anesthesia in operating rooms, and facilitated the development of simulation training to ensure patient safety.

The bottom line results of his work suggest that there is more than one way to achieve tort reform.  As training and practice standards evolved and improved, there were fewer adverse patient reactions to anesthesia and fewer deaths.  This resulted in lower costs to insurers, which led to lower malpractice rates for physicians.
Research brings about medical advances, improved training, and better patient treatment.  But thatā€™s not all.

The Framingham Heart Study was recently in the news because it released some new research linking poor health habits in middle age to brain shrinkage.  What makes this Study remarkable is that it has been ongoing since 1948. NIH is a partner, along with a number of other public and private institutions.  It is following its third generation of individuals now, and has participated in some of the most important advances in our understanding of cardiac disease risk factors.
We have another federal agency devoted to disease prevention, the CDC.  Its total budget of $11 billion is less than one half of one percent of our annual health care expenditures.

Most of us take for granted or devalue these agencies, and the many hundreds of researchers who have developed cures or treatments for disease, procedures and training that save patient lives, and strategies for preventing chronic conditions. 
The people who settled Jamestown did not yet know that blood circulated in the body, and those who prepared to declare our freedom from England still did not even know what oxygen was.

But our nationā€™s founders were scientists as well as public officials.  Modern health care is the result of their embrace of the miracle of modern science.
But in todayā€™s United States, not everyone has equal access to advanced prevention and treatments.  Our health care safety net no longer catches everyone.

And weā€™re forgetting the value of research ā€“ that because of it we now live longer, healthier lives.
Research requires funding, and a willingness to embrace the legacy of our parents and grandparents.

If you have questions about this column, or wish to receive an email notice when Our Health Policy Matters columns are published, please email gionfriddopaul@gmail.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

For the Health of Our Community, Can We Plan More in Advance?

Mayor Florsheim has proposed a budget with a 2.7 mill increase for the coming fiscal year. This will mean an increase in taxes of approximately $500 per year for a home with a market value (not an assessed value) of $250,000, with larger increases for many homes in our city. While I appreciate the time and effort that went into his budget calculation, like many people I donā€™t believe that this is a sustainable increase on top of the increases of the past few years. What I appreciate even more is that the Mayor has invited members of the public to work together to offer their own perspective and suggestions to the City Council. In the past few weeks, I have offered several short-term suggestions, including a job freeze, a search for an alternative health insurance provider, and greater advocacy at the state level for fairer PILOT funding for Middletown. As an example, the Mayorā€™s budget proposes $77,800 for a Grantwriter versus zero from the Finance Department. Maybe we wait on that? ...

Veterans and Mental Illness

On a sultry June morning in our nationalā€™s capital last Friday, I visited the Vietnam Veterans Memorial .   Scores of people moved silently along the Wall, viewing the names of the men and women who died in that war.   Some stopped and took pictures.   One group of men about my age surrounded one name for a photo.   Two young women posed in front of another, perhaps a grandfather or great uncle they never got to meet. It is always an incredibly moving experience to visit the Wall.   It treats each of the people it memorializes with respect. There is no rank among those honored.   Officer or enlisted, rich or poor, each is given equal space and weight. It is a form of acknowledgement and respect for which many veterans still fight. Brave Vietnam veterans returned from Southeast Asia to educate our nation about the effects of war and violence. I didnā€™t know anything about Post Traumatic Stress Disorder when I entered the Connecticut Legislature in the...

Scapegoats and Concepts of a Plan: How Trump Fails Us

When a politician says he has ā€œconcepts of a planā€ instead of a plan, there is no plan. And yet, thatā€™s where we are with Donald Trump, nine years after he first launched a political campaign promising to replace Obamacare with something cheaper and better, nearly four years after he had four years to try to do just that. And fail. Doubling down during Tuesdayā€™s debate, he claimed he had ā€œconcepts of a planā€ to replace Obamacare. Really? Heā€™s got nothing. In fact, he sounds just like Nixon sounded in 1968, when he claimed he had a ā€œsecretā€ plan to get us out of Vietnam. That turned out to be no plan at all (remember ā€œVietnamization?ā€) and cost us seven more years there and tens of thousands of lives. The Affordable Care Act, about which I wrote plenty in this blog a decade or more ago, wasnā€™t perfect. But it was a whole lot better than what we had before it ā€“ and anything (save a public option) that has been proposed since. Back then, insurers could deny coverage because of pre-exi...