Skip to main content

Florida's $11 Billion Medicaid Gamble

Want to get an email notice when new Our Health Policy Matters columns are posted?  Send an email to gionfriddopaul@gmail.com and I'll add you to the list.

Treating the public policy arena like a casino is never a good idea.
Florida is placing an $11 billion bet on Medicaid this year.  If the state loses, weā€™ll all be emptying our pockets for lower services.
The bet involves moving all Medicaid recipients to managed care.  As reported in an article by Jim Saunders in Health News Florida last week, passage of this legislation this year is as close to a sure thing as there is in government.
Florida hopes to save $1 billion the first year, and $2 billion by 2013 ā€“ nearly 10% of the total State Medicaid budget.
There are three problems with this calculation.
The first is that the projected savings from moving to managed care might be too high.  In a 2009 report prepared for Americaā€™s Health Insurance Plans, the Lewin Group found that savings in 24 different state Medicaid plans ranged from half of one percent to 20% after a switch to managed care.  Savings tended to be low at first, and most were still in the single digits after several years.
The second is that the savings will be offset by lost federal revenues, because the federal government will reimburse at least 55% of Floridaā€™s Medicaid costs the next two years.  The actual savings to taxpayers is under $1 billion in FY2013, less than half of what the Governor and legislators are claiming.
The third problem is that to achieve these savings, Florida has to include elders and people with disabilities ā€“ who together account for 70% of Medicaid expenditures ā€“ in managed care.
To many people, ā€œmanaged careā€ means the same thing as ā€œcare delayed or denied.ā€ If $700 million of Floridaā€™s Medicaid savings come from denying care to nursing home residents, cutting back on treatment services to people with mental illness, and delaying care for people with mental retardation, legislators fighting Medicaid growth wonā€™t exactly be hailed as conquering heroes.
Together, these factors leave at most $300 million in savings associated with the non-long term care Medicaid program.
But the savings may not be even that high.
The reality is that Florida had a much slower growth rate in its Medicaid program from 2004 through 2009 than did the nation as a whole. The cumulative savings in Florida over this period was 10% compared to Medicaid spending in the nation as a whole.  Florida may have already squeezed the savings from Medicaid without resorting to managed care. 
Also, there is a new cost associated with turning the program over to the private managed care companies.  Unlike the state, these companies have to make money, which has to be added into the cost calculation.
Finally, reports authored by Jack Hoadley and Joan Alker of the Georgetown Health Policy Institute and released yesterday by the Jessie Ball DuPont Fund suggest that Floridaā€™s own Medicaid managed care pilot program has disrupted care for Medicaid recipients while saving little or no money. 
In the face of all this evidence, saving even $300 million in Medicaid non-long term care is a long shot. 
So on what is Florida wagering $11 billion? 
Senator Joe Negron, the Senate legislationā€™s sponsor, says that Florida will drop out of the Medicaid program if the Federal Government refuses to go along with Floridaā€™s managed care plan.
Thatā€™s an $11 billion gamble ā€“ the annual Federal reimbursement that Senator Negron says Florida will give up if the federal government doesnā€™t let it switch to managed care.      
Obtaining federal approval for unpopular Medicaid changes which could disproportionately and adversely affect elders is no sure thing.     
If Florida drops out of Medicaid, 3 million Medicaid recipients will become uninsured.  This will bring the total number of uninsured people in Florida to close to 7 million ā€“ more than 35% of the population.
Hospitals, nursing homes, independent physicians, community health centers, mental health centers, and other providers do not have the capacity to absorb care for 7 million uninsured people. 
Instead, Florida would have to create and fund a new plan to pay for the care of all 7 million people.  To do this, it would have 9 billion state Medicaid dollars with which to work. 
$9 billion ā€“ or $1,300 per person ā€“ may seem like a lot of money to provide care for these 7 million people.  But they arenā€™t young and healthy ā€“ remember, 70% of the Medicaid dollars go to long term care ā€“ and one nursing home bed alone can cost fifty times this amount.
$9 billion could disappear in a matter of weeks.
Florida canā€™t afford the gamble.  If saving $300 million in the Medicaid non long-term care program is the stateā€™s goal, it should either find out in advance if the federal government is willing to approve or find another way to do it.   
After all, Floridaā€™s not playing with house money, but ours.      

Comments

  1. This is a really risky bet if you ask me. They can gamble with their own money, but not our Medicaid! Though this is for a good reason, it is not a good idea to blackmail the state like that.

    poker tips

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

For the Health of Our Community, Can We Plan More in Advance?

Mayor Florsheim has proposed a budget with a 2.7 mill increase for the coming fiscal year. This will mean an increase in taxes of approximately $500 per year for a home with a market value (not an assessed value) of $250,000, with larger increases for many homes in our city. While I appreciate the time and effort that went into his budget calculation, like many people I donā€™t believe that this is a sustainable increase on top of the increases of the past few years. What I appreciate even more is that the Mayor has invited members of the public to work together to offer their own perspective and suggestions to the City Council. In the past few weeks, I have offered several short-term suggestions, including a job freeze, a search for an alternative health insurance provider, and greater advocacy at the state level for fairer PILOT funding for Middletown. As an example, the Mayorā€™s budget proposes $77,800 for a Grantwriter versus zero from the Finance Department. Maybe we wait on that? ...

Veterans and Mental Illness

On a sultry June morning in our nationalā€™s capital last Friday, I visited the Vietnam Veterans Memorial .   Scores of people moved silently along the Wall, viewing the names of the men and women who died in that war.   Some stopped and took pictures.   One group of men about my age surrounded one name for a photo.   Two young women posed in front of another, perhaps a grandfather or great uncle they never got to meet. It is always an incredibly moving experience to visit the Wall.   It treats each of the people it memorializes with respect. There is no rank among those honored.   Officer or enlisted, rich or poor, each is given equal space and weight. It is a form of acknowledgement and respect for which many veterans still fight. Brave Vietnam veterans returned from Southeast Asia to educate our nation about the effects of war and violence. I didnā€™t know anything about Post Traumatic Stress Disorder when I entered the Connecticut Legislature in the...

Scapegoats and Concepts of a Plan: How Trump Fails Us

When a politician says he has ā€œconcepts of a planā€ instead of a plan, there is no plan. And yet, thatā€™s where we are with Donald Trump, nine years after he first launched a political campaign promising to replace Obamacare with something cheaper and better, nearly four years after he had four years to try to do just that. And fail. Doubling down during Tuesdayā€™s debate, he claimed he had ā€œconcepts of a planā€ to replace Obamacare. Really? Heā€™s got nothing. In fact, he sounds just like Nixon sounded in 1968, when he claimed he had a ā€œsecretā€ plan to get us out of Vietnam. That turned out to be no plan at all (remember ā€œVietnamization?ā€) and cost us seven more years there and tens of thousands of lives. The Affordable Care Act, about which I wrote plenty in this blog a decade or more ago, wasnā€™t perfect. But it was a whole lot better than what we had before it ā€“ and anything (save a public option) that has been proposed since. Back then, insurers could deny coverage because of pre-exi...