Skip to main content

Making People with Mental Illness Pay the Price

Isnā€™t it worth a few dollars to preserve essential mental health services?  It would appear that many state legislators would say no.
According to the National Alliance on Mental Illness, states have cut a total of $1.6 billion for mental health services over the past three years.
That was just the teaser. 
This year, states around the country are making people with mental illness pay the price for tax cuts and deficits.
NAMI state-by-state data show that the State of Florida spends no more for mental health services than it did in 2009.  But Health News Florida reports that the Florida Senate has proposed millions of dollars of cuts to mental health. 
Next week, its Appropriations Committee will vote whether to cut $137 million from adult mental health services, 57% of the total outpatient budget.  Anyone who thinks these services arenā€™t essential should think again.
On a single day this spring, in addition to offering its full array of group counseling, AA, NA, and individual support services, the only full-time peer drop-in center operated by MHA of Palm Beach County dealt with the death from natural causes of a middle-aged client (people with mental illness die 25 years earlier than normal), a former clientā€™s suicide, a hospital patient discharged to the center for follow-up services, and a person with a traumatic brain injury who had no other place to go.
ā€œDays like this are now common,ā€ commented MHAPBC CEO Pam Gionfriddo, ā€œand will become even more so if policymakers keep cutting.ā€
 Over 5,300 people in central Texas alone will lose services, according to the Austin American Statesman, if a proposed 20% cut in outpatient mental health services goes through.  The CEO of Austinā€™s major service provider said this would add to the suffering of families, and Lynn Lasky Clark, President of Mental Health America of Texas added that those affected would be ā€œdevastated.ā€
Texas already spends 3% less on mental health services than it did in 2009. 
Nevada spends 17% less on mental health services than it did in 2009.
But, according to the Las Vegas Sun, the Governorā€™s proposed budget includes millions of dollars of additional service cuts, including cuts to triage centers in Las Vegas and Reno and to outpatient counseling services.
Sen. Sheila Leslie termed the cuts ā€œa mental health catastrophe.ā€
Tennessee already spends 10% less on mental health services than it did in 2009.
Now, Tennessee is proposing to cut $31 million more from mental health services, affecting all areas of the state.
The northeast is not immune.  New Hampshire has cut mental health funding by 8% in the last two years.  This year, the state is considering eliminating all services for two-thirds of the 20,000 people for whom it has responsibility. 
Ditto the northwest.  Oregon actually added 23% to its state mental health budget the past two years.  However, Disability Rights Oregon reports that the state is now proposing cutting mental health services by 30%, costing 45,000 Oregonians access to care.
Letā€™s call this exactly what it is ā€“ public officials across the country pummeling people who are the least able to defend themselves.
The bad economy is a phony excuse. 
Even in the Great Depression, state policy makers increased mental health services to meet increased needs.  The census of patients served in mental hospitals ā€“ the only care option available at the time ā€“ grew from 272,252 on January 1, 1929 in 1929 to 321,824 on January 1, 1934, and the number of first admissions ā€“ a signal that new needs were being met ā€“ rose from 60,500 on January 1, 1929 to 69,368 on January 1, 1933.
Do policymakers really think times are tougher today than they were then?
Most legislators pray to God for enlightenment and compassion at the opening of each session.  Here is an excerpt from a Florida Senate prayer this year, offered on March 16th by Monsignor Thomas Skindeleski of Delray Beach:
ā€œOpen our minds to better understand the needs of those who have chosen us to serve them. Teach us how to craft laws that will better the lives of millions of people who are counting on our efforts to serve them well.  Let justice and peace be foremost in our minds as we endeavor to legislate in ways that will benefit the lives of our people. Direct our efforts to preserve the life and liberty of the most vulnerable members of our society.ā€
Itā€™s a powerful prayer.  I hope our leaders listened. 
Donā€™t smirk.  When was the last time we told our own elected officials that we willing to pay taxes to provide services to people with mental illness?  Today ā€“ before itā€™s too late ā€“ is the day to call, email, or forward this column to a policy leader.
We must add our voices to those of the mental health advocates speaking up for some of the most vulnerable members of our society.
Would you like to be notified about new Our Health Policy Matters blogs via email?  Just send an email to gionfriddopaul@gmail.com and I'll add you to my list.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

For the Health of Our Community, Can We Plan More in Advance?

Mayor Florsheim has proposed a budget with a 2.7 mill increase for the coming fiscal year. This will mean an increase in taxes of approximately $500 per year for a home with a market value (not an assessed value) of $250,000, with larger increases for many homes in our city. While I appreciate the time and effort that went into his budget calculation, like many people I donā€™t believe that this is a sustainable increase on top of the increases of the past few years. What I appreciate even more is that the Mayor has invited members of the public to work together to offer their own perspective and suggestions to the City Council. In the past few weeks, I have offered several short-term suggestions, including a job freeze, a search for an alternative health insurance provider, and greater advocacy at the state level for fairer PILOT funding for Middletown. As an example, the Mayorā€™s budget proposes $77,800 for a Grantwriter versus zero from the Finance Department. Maybe we wait on that? ...

Veterans and Mental Illness

On a sultry June morning in our nationalā€™s capital last Friday, I visited the Vietnam Veterans Memorial .   Scores of people moved silently along the Wall, viewing the names of the men and women who died in that war.   Some stopped and took pictures.   One group of men about my age surrounded one name for a photo.   Two young women posed in front of another, perhaps a grandfather or great uncle they never got to meet. It is always an incredibly moving experience to visit the Wall.   It treats each of the people it memorializes with respect. There is no rank among those honored.   Officer or enlisted, rich or poor, each is given equal space and weight. It is a form of acknowledgement and respect for which many veterans still fight. Brave Vietnam veterans returned from Southeast Asia to educate our nation about the effects of war and violence. I didnā€™t know anything about Post Traumatic Stress Disorder when I entered the Connecticut Legislature in the...

Scapegoats and Concepts of a Plan: How Trump Fails Us

When a politician says he has ā€œconcepts of a planā€ instead of a plan, there is no plan. And yet, thatā€™s where we are with Donald Trump, nine years after he first launched a political campaign promising to replace Obamacare with something cheaper and better, nearly four years after he had four years to try to do just that. And fail. Doubling down during Tuesdayā€™s debate, he claimed he had ā€œconcepts of a planā€ to replace Obamacare. Really? Heā€™s got nothing. In fact, he sounds just like Nixon sounded in 1968, when he claimed he had a ā€œsecretā€ plan to get us out of Vietnam. That turned out to be no plan at all (remember ā€œVietnamization?ā€) and cost us seven more years there and tens of thousands of lives. The Affordable Care Act, about which I wrote plenty in this blog a decade or more ago, wasnā€™t perfect. But it was a whole lot better than what we had before it ā€“ and anything (save a public option) that has been proposed since. Back then, insurers could deny coverage because of pre-exi...