Skip to main content

A Grown-up Health Policy Agenda for 2011

House Speaker John Boehner said recently that Congressional Republicans will have to face raising the debt ceiling as ā€œadults,ā€ echoing his March, 2010 comment that they needed to behave like ā€œgrown-upsā€ when health reform passed. 
The passage of health insurance reform in 2010 did not solve all of our health policy problems, but passing a meaningless repeal measure in the House in January isnā€™t the best way for members of Congress to start putting their grown-up pants on. 
What might an actual adult health policy agenda look like in 2011?
First, federal and state officials would put more resources into public health.  Like computer anti-virus programs, public health programs work in the background, taking care of us even when we fail to take care of ourselves.  They make sure our water is pure, our neighborhoods clean, our hazardous wastes are disposed of properly, and our children are immunized.  People can argue over whether various prevention initiatives cost more or less than treatment but no grown-up can deny their effectiveness. 
Except, perhaps, some public officials.  Floridaā€™s new governor is proposing to reduce the stateā€™s commitment to public health by folding the State Health Department into the agency that manages the health care system.  ā€œPotato salad,ā€ is what an AFSCME representative called this approach.  More like mystery meat, I think.    
Second, everyone should get a $100 tax credit for athletic equipment.  If weā€™re going to stimulate the economy with tax cuts, why not stimulate a culture of wellness?  Taking $30 billion of the trillion dollars weā€™ll spend on health care reform in the coming decade and giving $100 to every citizen for a new pair of athletic shoes, a down payment on a bike or treadmill, a first baseball glove, or other athletic equipment adapted to their needs, would make a meaningful, adult policy statement about the importance of fitness in all our lives.
Third, legislators should require periodic mental health screening as part of the well-care exams of children and young adults.  Serious mental illnesses hit young people disproportionately, and hit them as aggressively as cancers, taking 25 years or more off their lives.  (See the accompanying chart and the bottom of my Health Facts and Sources page for explanations about the comparison.)
We can treat most mental illnesses effectively if we treat them early and aggressively, but we often wait until itā€™s too late.  One 20 minute mental health screening every five years from age five through age 30 is all it would take to get started, and weā€™d be on the road to a healthier nation.     
Fourth, mental illnesses should be treated like other chronic diseases, not hidden away in jails.  Would anyone support sending people with uncontrolled diabetes to jail when they go into a diabetic coma because they are being a danger to themselves?  It sounds absurd, but thatā€™s how we treat a significant percentage of the over 25% of us diagnosed with a mental illness every year.  In 2007, Time magazine reported that the countryā€™s largest psychiatric institution was a prison.  Others have estimated that the majority of the people in our jails have mental illnesses.  While almost any alternative would be preferable, the simplest solution is to de-criminalize mental illness, adding more community mental health services and centers and funding them adequately.
Fifth, state and federal policymakers should pass laws de-criminalizing casual drug use and drug addiction.  Pat Robertson suggested this on his show on December 16, 2010, joining a growing chorus of others, including the Justice Policy Institute, who argue that drug treatment is far better and less expensive than incarceration.  Weā€™re still fighting and losing Richard Nixonā€™s War on Drugs, yet those who were born the year he declared it are turning 40 this year.   Itā€™s time for a change.  Controlling the use of other drugs, like marijuana, the way we control prescription drugs, alcohol, or nicotine is not the same as being ā€œfor drugs,ā€ and itā€™s a far more mature response to the situation we're in than hiding our heads and wishing the drug monsters away.
Sixth, Federal officials should expand the Medicare program to give everyone a medical home and pay for their free annual physical.  Wouldnā€™t this be a great birthday present for policymakers to give to every citizen ā€“ a partnership for health?  Congress went part way there in 2010 by including a free annual physical in the Medicare program, but this should be available to everyone, whether or not theyā€™re privately insured.  If itā€™s too scary and ā€œbig brotheryā€ for some public officials to take this one on, then at least they should provide a tax credit for people to use to pay for it themselves.       
Theyā€™re now reading the Constitution in Congress.  I hope they donā€™t skip over the part of Article One Section 8 that reminds Congress of its duty to provide for the general welfare ā€“ meaning the health, happiness, prosperity, and well-being of our people.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

For the Health of Our Community, Can We Plan More in Advance?

Mayor Florsheim has proposed a budget with a 2.7 mill increase for the coming fiscal year. This will mean an increase in taxes of approximately $500 per year for a home with a market value (not an assessed value) of $250,000, with larger increases for many homes in our city. While I appreciate the time and effort that went into his budget calculation, like many people I donā€™t believe that this is a sustainable increase on top of the increases of the past few years. What I appreciate even more is that the Mayor has invited members of the public to work together to offer their own perspective and suggestions to the City Council. In the past few weeks, I have offered several short-term suggestions, including a job freeze, a search for an alternative health insurance provider, and greater advocacy at the state level for fairer PILOT funding for Middletown. As an example, the Mayorā€™s budget proposes $77,800 for a Grantwriter versus zero from the Finance Department. Maybe we wait on that? ...

Veterans and Mental Illness

On a sultry June morning in our nationalā€™s capital last Friday, I visited the Vietnam Veterans Memorial .   Scores of people moved silently along the Wall, viewing the names of the men and women who died in that war.   Some stopped and took pictures.   One group of men about my age surrounded one name for a photo.   Two young women posed in front of another, perhaps a grandfather or great uncle they never got to meet. It is always an incredibly moving experience to visit the Wall.   It treats each of the people it memorializes with respect. There is no rank among those honored.   Officer or enlisted, rich or poor, each is given equal space and weight. It is a form of acknowledgement and respect for which many veterans still fight. Brave Vietnam veterans returned from Southeast Asia to educate our nation about the effects of war and violence. I didnā€™t know anything about Post Traumatic Stress Disorder when I entered the Connecticut Legislature in the...

Scapegoats and Concepts of a Plan: How Trump Fails Us

When a politician says he has ā€œconcepts of a planā€ instead of a plan, there is no plan. And yet, thatā€™s where we are with Donald Trump, nine years after he first launched a political campaign promising to replace Obamacare with something cheaper and better, nearly four years after he had four years to try to do just that. And fail. Doubling down during Tuesdayā€™s debate, he claimed he had ā€œconcepts of a planā€ to replace Obamacare. Really? Heā€™s got nothing. In fact, he sounds just like Nixon sounded in 1968, when he claimed he had a ā€œsecretā€ plan to get us out of Vietnam. That turned out to be no plan at all (remember ā€œVietnamization?ā€) and cost us seven more years there and tens of thousands of lives. The Affordable Care Act, about which I wrote plenty in this blog a decade or more ago, wasnā€™t perfect. But it was a whole lot better than what we had before it ā€“ and anything (save a public option) that has been proposed since. Back then, insurers could deny coverage because of pre-exi...