Skip to main content

Members of Congress Scrutinize Navigators More Than a Run-up to Possible War

In the nervous run-up to a possible military strike in Syria, fifteen members of Congress last week took time from their busy vacations to sign a letter demanding more information from governmental contractors. 

But the targets of their attention were not the defense contractors who received $161 billion for their services.  They were universities, legal aid organizations, and small nonprofits who will share $67 million to help citizens apply for health insurance beginning in October.


The Congressional Gang of 15 included Fred Upton from Michigan, Pete Olson, Joe Barton and Michael Burgess from Texas, Tim Murphy and Joseph Pitts from Pennsylvania, Marsha Blackburn from Tennessee, Phil Gingrey from Georgia, Steve Scalise from Louisiana, Gregg Harper from Mississippi, Corey Gardner from Colorado, Morgan Griffith from Virginia, Bill Johnson from Ohio, Billy Long from Missouri, and Renee Ellmers from North Carolina.

They sprang into action after the grants were awarded in mid-August, demanding a response in writing within two weeks.

Here are some of their demands (thank you to Kaiser Health News for linking to the letter):
  • “a written description of the work that will be performed,” including “a description of the number of employees, volunteers, or representatives that will be utilized and the pay and duties for each.”  
  • A detailed budget for the program.
  • “a written description of the training or education employees, volunteers, or representatives must complete,” plus educational requirements of the organization “beyond that required by any federal or state entity.”
  • Supervisory processes and procedures.
  • A description of how the organization will use the information obtained, including in follow-up communications with anyone with whom the organization speaks who might want to register to vote.
  • Any communications with any health provider or any health insurance carrier to whom any individual might be referred for health care or coverage.
  • All materials related to the grant application and award process.

Imagine being a 20 year old navigator in Florida just trying to help someone get insurance.  Do you really want some Congressman from Michigan “ACORNing” you if the person also asks you how to register to vote? 

Florida’s governor and do-nothing insurance commissioner aren’t going to help you.  They’ve already signaled their mistrust of navigators

You might think that any member of Congress who devotes so much vacation time to finding out whether sick people are getting help in finding a doctor would pay even more attention to matters that could soon drag our nation into another war.

And you might think that any member of the Congress taking time demanding this level of scrutiny about a program to help people get insured would apply a similar standard to other federal contractors. 

But you would be wrong.

When there’s more at stake, they sit back and wait.

Fred Upton, who has been on the job for twenty-five years and wrote the letter to the community agencies, hasn’t said a word in public about Syria.  He did, however, help a Vietnam veteran get his long-deserved service medals this month.  Pete Olson has no public position on military action, but said Congress should approve any.  Tim Murphy and Steve Scalise are among 140 members who want Congress “consulted” before the U.S. goes to war. And Billy Long went out on a limb when he asked the President to “tell his side of the story.”

If only they were as deferential about demanding the details about a paralegal contacting an insurer on behalf of a man with mental illness or a woman with cancer.

And take a look at the chart.  The value of the navigator contracts is so small compared to defense services contracts that you can’t even see it with the naked eye. 

As for the scrutiny they give to these other contracts that are worth 2499 times the value of the navigator contracts:


There is reason for outrage here.  You can decide over what.

Paul Gionfriddo via email: gionfriddopaul@gmail.com.  Twitter: @pgionfriddo.  Facebook: www.facebook.com/paul.gionfriddo.  LinkedIn:  www.linkedin.com/in/paulgionfriddo/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Veterans and Mental Illness

On a sultry June morning in our national’s capital last Friday, I visited the Vietnam Veterans Memorial .   Scores of people moved silently along the Wall, viewing the names of the men and women who died in that war.   Some stopped and took pictures.   One group of men about my age surrounded one name for a photo.   Two young women posed in front of another, perhaps a grandfather or great uncle they never got to meet. It is always an incredibly moving experience to visit the Wall.   It treats each of the people it memorializes with respect. There is no rank among those honored.   Officer or enlisted, rich or poor, each is given equal space and weight. It is a form of acknowledgement and respect for which many veterans still fight. Brave Vietnam veterans returned from Southeast Asia to educate our nation about the effects of war and violence. I didn’t know anything about Post Traumatic Stress Disorder when I entered the Connecticut Legislature in the late 1970s.   I had only vag

Scapegoats and Concepts of a Plan: How Trump Fails Us

When a politician says he has “concepts of a plan” instead of a plan, there is no plan. And yet, that’s where we are with Donald Trump, nine years after he first launched a political campaign promising to replace Obamacare with something cheaper and better, nearly four years after he had four years to try to do just that. And fail. Doubling down during Tuesday’s debate, he claimed he had “concepts of a plan” to replace Obamacare. Really? He’s got nothing. In fact, he sounds just like Nixon sounded in 1968, when he claimed he had a “secret” plan to get us out of Vietnam. That turned out to be no plan at all (remember “Vietnamization?”) and cost us seven more years there and tens of thousands of lives. The Affordable Care Act, about which I wrote plenty in this blog a decade or more ago, wasn’t perfect. But it was a whole lot better than what we had before it – and anything (save a public option) that has been proposed since. Back then, insurers could deny coverage because of pre-exi

Anxiety and the Presidential Election

Wow. Could the mainstream media do anything more to raise our anxiety levels about the 2024 election? And diminish or negate all the recent accomplishments in our country? Over the past three-and-a-half years, our nation’s economy has been the strongest in the world. Unemployment is at record lows, and the stock market is at record highs. NATO – which last came together to defend the United States in the aftermath of 9/11 – is stronger than ever. Border crossings are down. Massive infrastructure improvements are underway in every state. Prescription drug costs are lower. We finally got out of Afghanistan – evacuating more than 100,000 U.S. citizens and supporters – with just a handful of deaths. Inflation – which rose precipitously in the aftermath of the pandemic – has come back down, and prices in many areas have even begun to decline. And yet, all the media commentators can talk about these days – and they are not “reporters” when they are clearly offering opinions to frame the