Skip to main content

The Ten Best and Ten Worst States for Your Mental Health

Connecticut spends four times more per capita on state mental health services than Texas.  In Florida, 25 percent fewer people report having mental illnesses than in Washington.

Across the nation, there are significant differences in the amounts states spend on mental health services.  Connecticut spends $189 per capita, while Texas spends only $39.

But there are also significant differences in the reported prevalence of mental illnesses.  For example, fewer than 18 percent of Floridians report having a mental illness during the past year, but in Washington almost 24 percent do.

But what happens when you put spending and prevalence together?  Some new rankings emerge that give you a measure of each state’s real commitment to protecting mental health – and treating mental illness – in their population. 

This week, I have ranked all fifty states using both spending and prevalence data.      

I have taken per capita mental health spending from Kaiser Family Foundation’s State Health Facts data, and prevalence data from SAMHSA’s Summary of the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH).  Both data sets are from the 2010-2011 time period.

It turns out that some states spend more than ten times as much as others on behalf of people with mental illness.

You can no longer review the full list of the states because it was too dated.

But for now, if the commitment of state government is your measure, here were the ten best and ten worst states for your mental health in 2013.

The Best:

1. Maine.  Maine spends almost $1,900 per person with mental illness – 25 percent more than the next closest state.  It is tops in spending per capita, and but also 7th best in percentage in percentage of people reporting mental illnesses.

2. Alaska.  Alaska is middle-of-the-pack in prevalence, but it is second in spending per capita.  The result?  Alaska spends just under $1,500 per person with mental illness.

3. Pennsylvania.  Pennsylvania is 3rd overall in spending, but only 16th best in prevalence.  That still results in spending of over $1,400 per person with mental illness.

4. New York.  New York is 4th in spending, and middle-of-the-pack in prevalence.  It spends over $1,200 per person with mental illness.

5. Vermont.  Like New York, Vermont is 23 places higher in spending than in prevalence.

6. New Jersey.  New Jersey is 3rd best in prevalence, but still spends over $1,100 per person with mental illness.

7. Arizona.  Arizona is only 36th best in prevalence, but it invests well in mental health services, spending $1,044 per person with mental illness.

8. Connecticut.  Connecticut is one of eight states that spend at least $1,000 per person with mental illness.  It pays off for a state that is tied with Georgia for 9th best in prevalence.

9. North Carolina.  North Carolina’s high ranking is driven by a 4th best ranking in prevalence, and top twelve spending per capita.

10. Hawaii.  Balance is the key to Hawaii’s ranking – 15th in prevalence and 10th in spending.

And the worst:

41. South Carolina. South Carolina ranks 23rd best in prevalence, but is 43rd in spending.

42. Louisiana.  Louisiana is 35th in prevalence, but it is not enough to nudge up its overall ranking.

43. Utah. Utah is 49th in reported prevalence of mental illness – a surprise for a state that regularly ranks near the top in other health categories.  It spends only $263 per person with mental illness.

44. Kentucky.  Kentucky is middle-of-the-pack in prevalence, but spends only $259 per person with mental illness.

45. Georgia.  Georgia is tied with Connecticut for 9th best in prevalence, but it by spends only one-quarter as much per person with mental illness.

46. Oklahoma.  Oklahoma earns its ranking by placing 40th in prevalence and 45th in spending.

47. Florida.  Florida ranks second in prevalence, but only 48th position in spending per capita.  As a result, it spends just $222 per person with mental illness.

48. Texas.  Texas – which has the lowest prevalence of mental illness – still spends only $221 for each person with mental illness.

49. Arkansas.  Arkansas is one of only two states spending less than $200 per person with mental illness.  It is among the worst in both spending and prevalence.


50. Idaho.  Idaho is far and away the worst state for your mental health.  It is worst in reported prevalence and worst in reported spending.  How bad is Idaho?  At $143 per person, it spends less than one-tenth as much per person with mental illness as do Maine, Alaska, and Pennsylvania.

Paul Gionfriddo via email: gionfriddopaul@gmail.com.  Twitter: @pgionfriddo.  Facebook: www.facebook.com/paul.gionfriddo.  LinkedIn:  www.linkedin.com/in/paulgionfriddo/

Comments

  1. why are the rankings different on the chart than in your article?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You may have been comparing this to the "overall health ranking" chart of the states. The MH ranking chart is the third chart down on that page.

      Delete
  2. just curious if it's an updated list. I didn't see it until today which is April 2014

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These were the most recent data that were available as of last August, when I created it. There will be newer data reported later on this year, but the last time I checked (about a month ago) the data from the original sources had not yet been updated.

      Delete
    2. I would really beg to differ regarding Arizona and mental health care. Many psychatrists don't even accept insurance period. I have had issues with finding a provider in the past and know people who are currently having the same issues. I am on Ahcccs and I feel I am not getting the care I need, because I feel that I am not being heard. I feel I need some more intense care and have been struggling with providers for some time now and feel blown off.

      Delete
  3. Michigans mental health is horrible! Thanks to continual cuts! Im ready to pack up and move. Im livid, pissed, scared and angry! Time to revolt!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The problem with the spending data is that it is by the state's mental health authority. In some states the MHA and Medicaid are integrated, in some states they are not. Idaho, where they are not integrated, has a Medicaid Behavioral Health contract for over $100,000,000 per year--working out to be about $250 per person with mental illness, by this measure. Not defending Idaho, it's worth taking a look at the underlying data. The state spending data is not apples-to-apples.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My suggestion is to look at the Mental Health America chart books for more information. A new one will be out soon. They use more than the two indicators I had, and the results are fascinating.

      Delete
  5. Washington is HORRIBLE especially for a minor. We are fighting with services for my 16 you son. All most do is give out resource numbers and pass the buck. It's a sad sad situation.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Veterans and Mental Illness

On a sultry June morning in our national’s capital last Friday, I visited the Vietnam Veterans Memorial .   Scores of people moved silently along the Wall, viewing the names of the men and women who died in that war.   Some stopped and took pictures.   One group of men about my age surrounded one name for a photo.   Two young women posed in front of another, perhaps a grandfather or great uncle they never got to meet. It is always an incredibly moving experience to visit the Wall.   It treats each of the people it memorializes with respect. There is no rank among those honored.   Officer or enlisted, rich or poor, each is given equal space and weight. It is a form of acknowledgement and respect for which many veterans still fight. Brave Vietnam veterans returned from Southeast Asia to educate our nation about the effects of war and violence. I didn’t know anything about Post Traumatic Stress Disorder when I entered the Connecticut Legislature in the...

Scapegoats and Concepts of a Plan: How Trump Fails Us

When a politician says he has “concepts of a plan” instead of a plan, there is no plan. And yet, that’s where we are with Donald Trump, nine years after he first launched a political campaign promising to replace Obamacare with something cheaper and better, nearly four years after he had four years to try to do just that. And fail. Doubling down during Tuesday’s debate, he claimed he had “concepts of a plan” to replace Obamacare. Really? He’s got nothing. In fact, he sounds just like Nixon sounded in 1968, when he claimed he had a “secret” plan to get us out of Vietnam. That turned out to be no plan at all (remember “Vietnamization?”) and cost us seven more years there and tens of thousands of lives. The Affordable Care Act, about which I wrote plenty in this blog a decade or more ago, wasn’t perfect. But it was a whole lot better than what we had before it – and anything (save a public option) that has been proposed since. Back then, insurers could deny coverage because of pre-exi...

Anxiety and the Presidential Election

Wow. Could the mainstream media do anything more to raise our anxiety levels about the 2024 election? And diminish or negate all the recent accomplishments in our country? Over the past three-and-a-half years, our nation’s economy has been the strongest in the world. Unemployment is at record lows, and the stock market is at record highs. NATO – which last came together to defend the United States in the aftermath of 9/11 – is stronger than ever. Border crossings are down. Massive infrastructure improvements are underway in every state. Prescription drug costs are lower. We finally got out of Afghanistan – evacuating more than 100,000 U.S. citizens and supporters – with just a handful of deaths. Inflation – which rose precipitously in the aftermath of the pandemic – has come back down, and prices in many areas have even begun to decline. And yet, all the media commentators can talk about these days – and they are not “reporters” when they are clearly offering opinions to frame the...