Skip to main content

A Political Leader Rejects the Safety Net That Saved His Family


Will Weatherford is a political name to remember, no matter where you live.

Weatherford is the Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, a rising political star and a CPAC convention speaker this week, who “is widely regarded as a polished politician with excellent instincts,” according to the Tampa Bay Times.

I’m not so sure about those instincts.

In his opening speech of the new legislative session, Weatherford came out strongly in opposition to Medicaid expansion, saying it “crosses the line of the proper role of government.” He called Medicaid a “broken system.”  

But Weatherford wasn’t content to leave it at that.  He invoked a moving, personal narrative to introduce his opposition to the Medicaid expansion.

He told the tragic story of his young brother, who developed and died of cancer as an infant.  I can’t imagine what it was like for 15-year old Weatherford, his seven other siblings, or his parents to go through such a heart-wrenching experience.

And on top of it, Weatherford’s father was self-employed and couldn’t afford to insure his family.  I can relate.  I was also self-employed in the mid-1990s, and it cost me over $600 per month even then to insure my family. 

So when the six-figure hospital bills came, they could have wiped the Weatherfords out.

But they didn’t, because of a safety net that was in place.  “It was the safety net that picked my father up,” Weatherford said.  “It was the safety net that picked my family up.”

What Weatherford did not say was that the safety net was Medicaid. 

Afterwards, Weatherford denied that Medicaid paid the bills.  But after his father confirmed that it did, Weatherford was forced to back-track and acknowledge the role of Medicaid in his own family’s life.
This all happened in the mid-1990s. 

And, ironically, it seems that Weatherford’s family may have benefited from a Medicaid expansion that took place just a few years earlier.  That mandatory Medicaid expansion occurred in 1989, and covered children up to the age of 6 up to 133% of poverty.  It meant that Weatherford’s brother became eligible for Medicaid via its “medically needy” program once the family’s income dropped below approximately $44,000.

That Medicaid expansion had its legislative detractors, too.  I was in a state legislature then.  I remember speeches in which legislators argued against both the expansion and the “medically needy” program because they didn’t think middle class families like the Weatherfords should be taking advantage of the program.  And U.S. Senators Mitch McConnell and Jesse Helms both recorded votes in opposition to the OBRA 1989 law that helped the Weatherfords. 

Maybe Weatherford is unaware of that history. 

But whether or not Weatherford is aware of history doesn’t change it.  Medicaid was only available for his baby brother because of federal expansions of the program that took place years before. 

And it became available to other children because of subsequent expansions. 

But it will only be available to their parents and older siblings if he supports this expansion.

Like Will Weatherford’s family, my family has benefitted from the Medicaid program.  During her final illness, my mother received Medicaid benefits through a special program in Connecticut so that she could remain in her own home and not have to enter a nursing home.  I have no doubt that this program extended her life.  I know that it improved its quality.

And my son, who has suffered from a life-threatening chronic disease for over twenty years now – one that cost him his education, his ability to work, and even his ability to live independently – has also used Medicaid as his safety net.

So here’s what bothers me most about Weatherford’s position.

It isn’t that we disagree about the safety net.  In fact, we are both openly grateful for what the federal safety net program called Medicaid did for our own families.

It is that his instincts failed him when he took for granted the political courage that it took to expand Medicaid in 1989 to help his family.  And they failed him again when he cavalierly dismissed the expansion today as if helping other families in need were all just a waste.  

He has a duty to see the bigger picture.   

He can start by embracing the program that embraced his brother.

To reach Paul Gionfriddo via email: gionfriddopaul@gmail.com.  Twitter: @pgionfriddo.  Facebook: www.facebook.com/paul.gionfriddo.  LinkedIn:  www.linkedin.com/in/paulgionfriddo/

Comments

  1. It's amazing enough when people vote against their own self interests; its absolutely frightening when "respected politicians" speak to issues like medicaid and don't understand how it's benefited their own families and hundreds of thousands of families across America. Ignorance I understand, lack of compassion and concern for the needs of families in America is unfathomably. I still don't understand what republicans mean when they speak about family values

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Veterans and Mental Illness

On a sultry June morning in our national’s capital last Friday, I visited the Vietnam Veterans Memorial .   Scores of people moved silently along the Wall, viewing the names of the men and women who died in that war.   Some stopped and took pictures.   One group of men about my age surrounded one name for a photo.   Two young women posed in front of another, perhaps a grandfather or great uncle they never got to meet. It is always an incredibly moving experience to visit the Wall.   It treats each of the people it memorializes with respect. There is no rank among those honored.   Officer or enlisted, rich or poor, each is given equal space and weight. It is a form of acknowledgement and respect for which many veterans still fight. Brave Vietnam veterans returned from Southeast Asia to educate our nation about the effects of war and violence. I didn’t know anything about Post Traumatic Stress Disorder when I entered the Connecticut Legislature in the late 1970s.   I had only vag

Scapegoats and Concepts of a Plan: How Trump Fails Us

When a politician says he has “concepts of a plan” instead of a plan, there is no plan. And yet, that’s where we are with Donald Trump, nine years after he first launched a political campaign promising to replace Obamacare with something cheaper and better, nearly four years after he had four years to try to do just that. And fail. Doubling down during Tuesday’s debate, he claimed he had “concepts of a plan” to replace Obamacare. Really? He’s got nothing. In fact, he sounds just like Nixon sounded in 1968, when he claimed he had a “secret” plan to get us out of Vietnam. That turned out to be no plan at all (remember “Vietnamization?”) and cost us seven more years there and tens of thousands of lives. The Affordable Care Act, about which I wrote plenty in this blog a decade or more ago, wasn’t perfect. But it was a whole lot better than what we had before it – and anything (save a public option) that has been proposed since. Back then, insurers could deny coverage because of pre-exi

Anxiety and the Presidential Election

Wow. Could the mainstream media do anything more to raise our anxiety levels about the 2024 election? And diminish or negate all the recent accomplishments in our country? Over the past three-and-a-half years, our nation’s economy has been the strongest in the world. Unemployment is at record lows, and the stock market is at record highs. NATO – which last came together to defend the United States in the aftermath of 9/11 – is stronger than ever. Border crossings are down. Massive infrastructure improvements are underway in every state. Prescription drug costs are lower. We finally got out of Afghanistan – evacuating more than 100,000 U.S. citizens and supporters – with just a handful of deaths. Inflation – which rose precipitously in the aftermath of the pandemic – has come back down, and prices in many areas have even begun to decline. And yet, all the media commentators can talk about these days – and they are not “reporters” when they are clearly offering opinions to frame the