Skip to main content

President Obama's New Health Policy Road



Newly re-elected President Barack Obama may now have a new road to health policy-making after three years of defending the Affordable Care Act.  And even if the Congress does nothing to help in the months to come, his road may be a whole lot easier than it has been.

Even with the Affordable Care Act in place, our health policy debate has been dominated by the belief that health care Armageddon is just around the corner.

But some recent data suggest that Armageddon may still be down the road.

Just how far may well determine how our health policy debate shakes out over the next two years.

First, let's look at the Armageddon scenario.

The candidates accepted the scenario that health care costs are out of control when they made the future of Medicare and Medicaid a centerpiece of the campaign.  Governor Romney’s proposed solution was to clamp down on federal funding for these programs.  President Obama advocated managing state and local costs by expanding the federal role in both programs.

But neither strategy leads to lower projected Medicare and Medicaid spending in the near future.  Both will become trillion dollar programs in the next few years.  There’s no turning back; this is already written in stone as the baby boomers age.

The $716 billion Medicare rate cut in both the Affordable Care Act and the Ryan Budget will help.  But it won’t be enough to stop Medicare from growing to 6% of GDP over the next generation.  And at least part of that cut – the physician payment cut – is likely to be overturned by the new Congress. 

So if policy leaders want to save Medicare, they will have to do more.  But there is no consensus about what this should be.

Medicaid spending is even more contentious, because the program is so expensive for the states. 

Romney’s solution – to change it to a block grant – only addressed this problem on the surface.  This is because the increase in projected Medicaid costs represents the actual projected costs of the actual projected Medicaid-eligible people using today’s eligibility standards. 

To put this more simply, there will be a trillion dollar bill to pay, no matter what.  Block grants will only change who pays that bill. 

Obama’s choice – to have this burden shouldered equally by everyone through the federal government – will help states immensely, but won’t make the program any cheaper.

The cost of healthcare for returning veterans will also drive health care costs upward during the next few years. 

In 2010, the CBO estimated that this could mean another $30 billion in VA spending over what we are paying today.

In this Armageddon scenario, all the pressure on governmental health care spending pushes upward.  And we have no clear policy solutions.

Limiting the growth in Medicare spending to 5% per year, instead of 5.7% is something for which most of the members of both parties have voted during the last two years.  That is already in place through the Affordable Care Act, and one potentially bipartisan option. 

But we need to go much lower than this to reduce the GDP burden of health care, and more aggressive rate-setting and regulation may do irreparable harm to certain safety net providers.

So President Obama’s hands may be tied – unless our healthcare future is tied to the second scenario.

In this scenario, healthcare inflationary growth declines rapidly.  And the information from 2010 and 2011 suggests that this is exactly what is happening.

Health care inflation was under 4% per year for two straight years in 2010 and 2011 for the first time in fifty years.  This may well have been recession-related.  But if health inflation stays low for even a little while longer, this will change the trajectory of health spending projections for years to come.

That may be why President Obama and Vice-President Biden made this a centerpiece of their campaign message in the closing weeks of the campaign. 

Even if the new Congress does nothing, low inflation changes the health policy picture dramatically.

Low health care inflation will add years of life to Medicare, absorb the 2.8% projected increase in state Medicaid spending attributable to the Medicaid expansion, and eventually drive down the price of health insurance even as Affordable Care Act consumer protections remain in place.

That puts the President in a position of strength for the next two years.  President Obama just won a tightly contested re-election.  The next few months will decide with just how easily his health policy agenda moves forward now.

Comments

  1. In The Walls Road Publication, Business Globe author Holman.New You are able to » More.Chief executive Obama became only the second Democrat since FDR to be .We need restoration guidelines that can hit two bogies at once—immediate . have introduced self-discipline to wellness investing, favoring more free-lunchism.Affiliate Promo Formula Review

    ReplyDelete
  2. I know this is one of the best blogs I have ever read for a long time. I will try to share and support for it.


    Bimatoprost

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Veterans and Mental Illness

On a sultry June morning in our national’s capital last Friday, I visited the Vietnam Veterans Memorial .   Scores of people moved silently along the Wall, viewing the names of the men and women who died in that war.   Some stopped and took pictures.   One group of men about my age surrounded one name for a photo.   Two young women posed in front of another, perhaps a grandfather or great uncle they never got to meet. It is always an incredibly moving experience to visit the Wall.   It treats each of the people it memorializes with respect. There is no rank among those honored.   Officer or enlisted, rich or poor, each is given equal space and weight. It is a form of acknowledgement and respect for which many veterans still fight. Brave Vietnam veterans returned from Southeast Asia to educate our nation about the effects of war and violence. I didn’t know anything about Post Traumatic Stress Disorder when I entered the Connecticut Legislature in the late 1970s.   I had only vag

Scapegoats and Concepts of a Plan: How Trump Fails Us

When a politician says he has “concepts of a plan” instead of a plan, there is no plan. And yet, that’s where we are with Donald Trump, nine years after he first launched a political campaign promising to replace Obamacare with something cheaper and better, nearly four years after he had four years to try to do just that. And fail. Doubling down during Tuesday’s debate, he claimed he had “concepts of a plan” to replace Obamacare. Really? He’s got nothing. In fact, he sounds just like Nixon sounded in 1968, when he claimed he had a “secret” plan to get us out of Vietnam. That turned out to be no plan at all (remember “Vietnamization?”) and cost us seven more years there and tens of thousands of lives. The Affordable Care Act, about which I wrote plenty in this blog a decade or more ago, wasn’t perfect. But it was a whole lot better than what we had before it – and anything (save a public option) that has been proposed since. Back then, insurers could deny coverage because of pre-exi

Anxiety and the Presidential Election

Wow. Could the mainstream media do anything more to raise our anxiety levels about the 2024 election? And diminish or negate all the recent accomplishments in our country? Over the past three-and-a-half years, our nation’s economy has been the strongest in the world. Unemployment is at record lows, and the stock market is at record highs. NATO – which last came together to defend the United States in the aftermath of 9/11 – is stronger than ever. Border crossings are down. Massive infrastructure improvements are underway in every state. Prescription drug costs are lower. We finally got out of Afghanistan – evacuating more than 100,000 U.S. citizens and supporters – with just a handful of deaths. Inflation – which rose precipitously in the aftermath of the pandemic – has come back down, and prices in many areas have even begun to decline. And yet, all the media commentators can talk about these days – and they are not “reporters” when they are clearly offering opinions to frame the