Newly re-elected President Barack Obama may now have a new
road to health policy-making after three years of defending the Affordable Care
Act. And even if the Congress does nothing
to help in the months to come, his road may be a whole lot easier than it has
been.
Even with the Affordable Care Act in place, our health policy debate has been dominated by the belief that health care Armageddon is just around the corner.
But some recent data suggest that Armageddon may still be down
the road.
Just how far may well determine how our health policy debate shakes out over the next two years.
First, let's look at the Armageddon scenario.
The candidates accepted the scenario that health care costs
are out of control when they made the future of Medicare and Medicaid a
centerpiece of the campaign. Governor
Romney’s proposed solution was to clamp down on federal funding for these programs. President Obama advocated managing state and
local costs by expanding the federal role in both programs.
But neither strategy leads to lower projected Medicare and
Medicaid spending in the near future. Both
will become trillion dollar programs in the next few years. There’s no turning back; this is already
written in stone as the baby boomers age.
The $716 billion Medicare rate cut in both the Affordable
Care Act and the Ryan Budget will help.
But it won’t be enough to stop Medicare from growing to 6% of GDP over
the next generation. And at least part
of that cut – the physician payment cut – is likely to be overturned by the new
Congress.
So if policy leaders want to save Medicare, they will have
to do more. But there is no consensus
about what this should be.
Medicaid spending is
even more contentious, because the program is so expensive for the states.
Romney’s solution – to change it to a block grant – only addressed
this problem on the surface. This is
because the increase in projected Medicaid costs represents the actual
projected costs of the actual projected Medicaid-eligible people using today’s
eligibility standards.
To put this more simply, there will be a trillion dollar bill
to pay, no matter what. Block grants will
only change who pays that bill.
Obama’s choice – to have this burden shouldered equally by
everyone through the federal government – will help states immensely, but won’t
make the program any cheaper.
The cost of
healthcare for returning veterans will also drive health care costs upward
during the next few years.
In 2010, the CBO
estimated that this could mean another $30 billion in VA spending over what
we are paying today.
In this Armageddon scenario, all the pressure on governmental
health care spending pushes upward. And
we have no clear policy solutions.
Limiting the growth in Medicare spending to 5% per year,
instead of 5.7% is something for which most of the members of both parties have
voted during the last two years. That is
already in place through the Affordable Care Act, and one potentially
bipartisan option.
But we need to go much lower than this to reduce the GDP
burden of health care, and more aggressive rate-setting and regulation may do irreparable
harm to certain safety net providers.
So President Obama’s
hands may be tied – unless our healthcare future is tied to the second
scenario.
In this scenario, healthcare inflationary growth declines
rapidly. And the information from 2010
and 2011 suggests that this is exactly what is happening.
Health care inflation was
under 4% per year for two straight years in 2010 and 2011 for the first
time in fifty years. This may well have
been recession-related. But if health
inflation stays low for even a little while longer, this will change the
trajectory of health spending projections for years to come.
That may be why President Obama and Vice-President Biden made
this a centerpiece of their campaign message in the closing weeks of the
campaign.
Even if the new
Congress does nothing, low inflation changes the health policy picture
dramatically.
Low health care inflation will add years of life to
Medicare, absorb the 2.8% projected increase in state Medicaid spending
attributable to the Medicaid expansion, and eventually drive down the price of
health insurance even as Affordable Care Act consumer protections remain in
place.
That puts the President in a position of strength for the
next two years. President Obama just won
a tightly contested re-election. The
next few months will decide with just how easily his health policy agenda moves
forward now.
In The Walls Road Publication, Business Globe author Holman.New You are able to » More.Chief executive Obama became only the second Democrat since FDR to be .We need restoration guidelines that can hit two bogies at once—immediate . have introduced self-discipline to wellness investing, favoring more free-lunchism.Affiliate Promo Formula Review
ReplyDeleteI know this is one of the best blogs I have ever read for a long time. I will try to share and support for it.
ReplyDeleteBimatoprost