Skip to main content

A Little Compromise Will Save Medicare


A person who was unhappy with the outcome of the election suggested that the voters gave President Obama a “Mulligan” on election day – a second chance to do things right.  That’s one way to look at it.

But if you belief that, then you also have to say the same thing about the divided Congress – it, too, was being given at least one more chance to get things right.

That means agreeing to the surprisingly little compromise on which the future of Medicare will depend.

It’s hard to understand how two sides looking at the same reality and sharing the same goals could be so far apart in coming to an agreement about what to do.  Nowhere is this more evident than in the Medicare program debate.

Both sides acknowledge that Medicare is as popular as any entitlement, is as well run as any health insurance program, and addresses a need that is only going to grow in the coming years.

They also agree on certain facts.  The first is that Medicare hasn’t yet contributed to our debt.  The second is that it won’t for at least another 12 years, because there are enough reserves in the Medicare Trust Fund to offset any program deficits for that long.  The third is that the size of the program deficit last year was $19 billion. 

They also agree that on its present course, Medicare will eventually become too expensive to maintain.

There are two down-the-road problems with the Medicare program. 

The first is related to Medicare and healthcare inflation.  On its current inflationary trajectory the cost of Medicare will grow as the cost of healthcare in general grows.  Medicare alone will consume 6% of our GDP by the time today’s young adults become Medicare-eligible, and up to 7% of our GDP by the time babies being born today become Medicare-eligible.

The second is related to the current $19 billion Medicare deficit.  If this deficit isn’t closed, then it will grow over time, wipe out the Trust Fund, and undermine the entire Medicare program.

We need Congressional action to address both of these problems.

Congress has already taken some actions to address the first problem – the long-term inflationary growth in the Medicare program.  

The $716 billion in rate cuts included in the Affordable Care Act reduced Medicare’s long-term projected share of GDP from 10% to 7%.  This is a significant difference, accomplished without cutting a single benefit because the time horizon is so long.

If that were all we needed, Congress could recess before it even convenes.

But $716 billion isn’t enough to prevent the Medicare share of GDP from growing from 4% today to 6% twenty-five years from now.  And one part of that cut – an immediate 30% reduction in some provider rates – will likely be “fixed” at least in part by the new Congress as it has every year since 2002.

So we need another strategy, one that involves compromise. 

And the beginning of that compromise could be in two small steps that Congress and the President might take to address the second problem – closing the $19 billion deficit today. 

One step involves taxes and the other step involves spending.

In 2011, according to the Medicare Trustees 2012 Annual Report, Medicare revenues were $530 billion and Medicare expenses were $549 billion. If that gap were closed moving forward, then the Medicare Trust Fund would remain solvent.  And the Medicare program would be secure no matter what Medicare's share of future GDP is.

Closing a $19 billion gap in a $549 billion program shouldn’t be an insurmountable problem for governmental leaders.  It shouldn’t demand much political posturing.  And it doesn’t require a “grand bargain.”

If it were to be done just through a Medicare tax increase, it would cost every Medicare taxpayer (typically under the age of 65) an average of less than $10 per month.

If it were to be done just through a reduction in Medicare benefits, it would cost each Medicare beneficiary (typically over the age of 65) just over $30 per month.

What if we all shared the burden together?  That might mean an average $7 per month tax increase and an average $10 per month benefit reduction.

The American people might well agree to such a Medicare bargain.  And be thankful for the compromise. 

Happy Thanksgiving!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Veterans and Mental Illness

On a sultry June morning in our national’s capital last Friday, I visited the Vietnam Veterans Memorial .   Scores of people moved silently along the Wall, viewing the names of the men and women who died in that war.   Some stopped and took pictures.   One group of men about my age surrounded one name for a photo.   Two young women posed in front of another, perhaps a grandfather or great uncle they never got to meet. It is always an incredibly moving experience to visit the Wall.   It treats each of the people it memorializes with respect. There is no rank among those honored.   Officer or enlisted, rich or poor, each is given equal space and weight. It is a form of acknowledgement and respect for which many veterans still fight. Brave Vietnam veterans returned from Southeast Asia to educate our nation about the effects of war and violence. I didn’t know anything about Post Traumatic Stress Disorder when I entered the Connecticut Legislature in the late 1970s.   I had only vag

Scapegoats and Concepts of a Plan: How Trump Fails Us

When a politician says he has “concepts of a plan” instead of a plan, there is no plan. And yet, that’s where we are with Donald Trump, nine years after he first launched a political campaign promising to replace Obamacare with something cheaper and better, nearly four years after he had four years to try to do just that. And fail. Doubling down during Tuesday’s debate, he claimed he had “concepts of a plan” to replace Obamacare. Really? He’s got nothing. In fact, he sounds just like Nixon sounded in 1968, when he claimed he had a “secret” plan to get us out of Vietnam. That turned out to be no plan at all (remember “Vietnamization?”) and cost us seven more years there and tens of thousands of lives. The Affordable Care Act, about which I wrote plenty in this blog a decade or more ago, wasn’t perfect. But it was a whole lot better than what we had before it – and anything (save a public option) that has been proposed since. Back then, insurers could deny coverage because of pre-exi

Anxiety and the Presidential Election

Wow. Could the mainstream media do anything more to raise our anxiety levels about the 2024 election? And diminish or negate all the recent accomplishments in our country? Over the past three-and-a-half years, our nation’s economy has been the strongest in the world. Unemployment is at record lows, and the stock market is at record highs. NATO – which last came together to defend the United States in the aftermath of 9/11 – is stronger than ever. Border crossings are down. Massive infrastructure improvements are underway in every state. Prescription drug costs are lower. We finally got out of Afghanistan – evacuating more than 100,000 U.S. citizens and supporters – with just a handful of deaths. Inflation – which rose precipitously in the aftermath of the pandemic – has come back down, and prices in many areas have even begun to decline. And yet, all the media commentators can talk about these days – and they are not “reporters” when they are clearly offering opinions to frame the