Skip to main content

The Worst States for Your Health, 2012


What do South Carolina, Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi have in common?

They all find themselves among the worst states for your health.  And they all have governors who have already declared that they don’t want to expand Medicaid to uninsured adults in their states.

South Carolina ranks 40th, Texas is 41st, Louisiana is 44th, and Mississippi is 47th in the 2012 Our Health Policy Matters rankings of the states.

The worst state for your health this year is Oklahoma, which dropped from 47th a year ago. 

New Mexico came in just ahead of Oklahoma, and just below Nevada, Mississippi, and Arkansas.  Rounding out the bottom ten were Alabama, Louisiana, West Virginia, Texas, and Montana.

Led by middle-of-the-pack Medicare and Medicaid community spending, West Virginia escaped the bottom of the rankings this year.  Its 43rd place finish represents an improvement of seven places over last year’s worst-in-the-nation finish. 

On the other hand, Texas had a comparable fall into the bottom ten, plunging five places to a tie for 41st from its finish last year, on the heels of bottom ten Healthy State and KidsCount Health rankings. 

Kentucky made the biggest jump out of the bottom ten during the past year, from 45th in 2011 to 35th in 2012.

The states with governors who have said that they will reject the Medicaid expansion are among those states whose citizens probably need it the most.

In addition to South Carolina, Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, three other states have governors who declared that they would refuse to expand the Medicaid program in 2014 – despite the federal government’s offer to pick up 100% of the cost in the first three years and at least 90% ever after.  Florida landed at the cusp of the bottom third, finishing in 33rd place overall.  Georgia just managed to stay out of the bottom ten.  Only Iowa, which ranked 19th, escaped from the bottom half of the rankings.

But what is most interesting about the rejecting states is that they all do a relatively poor job of directing their current Medicaid money toward home and community-based services.


  • Georgia ranks last in that category, Florida ranks 43rd, Mississippi ranks 42nd, Louisiana ranks 35th, South Carolina ranks 34th, Texas ranks 32nd, and Iowa ranks 25th.

And as a group, their Healthy State rankings – a measure of how effectively the states support public health – aren’t any better.


  • Mississippi ranks 50th (last), Louisiana ranks 49th, South Carolina ranks 45th, Texas ranks 44th, Georgia ranks 37th, Florida ranks 33rd, and Iowa ranks 17th on that measure.

The states at or near the bottom of the rankings should also be nervous about the changes Paul Ryan has proposed for the Medicare program.


  • Medicare spending on community services is the one area in which many of these states shine.  Community per capita Medicare spending in Oklahoma, for example, is 13th in the nation.  In Nevada it is 16th. In Mississippi it is 10th.  In Alabama it is 8th.  And in Louisiana it is 3rd.  (Florida is first in this category.)


Ryan’s proposed transition of Medicare to a voucher program, with a cap on the value of the voucher, could turn out to be the first step in a long process that undermines these community-based Medicare services. 

Medicare recipients down the road might want to use their voucher money to continue to pay for these, but they might have to use it to cover hospital stays instead.

The full rankings are available here.

The OHPM rankings are a modest attempt to average rankings from several independent sources to provide an overall picture, relative to the other states, of both the health of a state’s population and the overall quality and accessibility of the state’s health care services. 

The rankings factor in:
  • Public health and prevention
  • Access to primary care services
  • Access to home and community-based health services, especially for low income and elderly people
  • Access to quality hospital care, including general and specialty hospital programs (including mental health)
  • Private insurance coverage of the population

This year’s rankings incorporated three recently-released independent rankings.  These were the 2012 KidsCount Health Rankings, the 2011 Healthy State Rankings, and the 2012 U.S. News and World Report Hospital Ratings.  They also factored in the most recent CMS data on state per capita community (non-hospital and non-nursing home) Medicare and Medicaid spending on community health care services, and Kaiser State Health Facts data on the state’s prevalence of nurse practitioners and the state percentage of privately-insured individuals.     

If you have questions about this column or wish to receive an email notifying you when new Our Health Policy Matters columns are published, email gionfriddopaul@gmail.com.

Comments

  1. Medical health insurance individuals in the future might want to use their coupon cash to keep pay for these, but they might have to use it to protect medical center remains instead.

    Health Insurance Tallahassee


    ReplyDelete
  2. I want to purchase an individual health insurance policy and need help with all the options! I'm planning on getting surgery on my foot as soon as I am insured. Other than that I am normally pretty healthy and don't need to visit the doctor but twice a year.. I'm 24 male non-smoker btw

    phlebotomy schools in WV

    ReplyDelete
  3. In fact, I do not have much time searching websites or blogs to read. But today I have found this blog. It is so good. I gained much from it.


    Careprost

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Missing Mental Health Element in the Ferguson Story

By now, everyone has heard the news from Ferguson, Missouri.  An unarmed 18 year old named Michael Brown was shot and killed by a police officer.  Michael Brown was black. Some of the events surrounding the shooting are in dispute.  But what isn’t in dispute is that for the past two weeks, a community has been torn apart by race – a community that until recently was best known for its proximity to St. Louis and its designation as a Playful City, USA . Picture credit: Health Affairs Media reports since the August 9 th shooting have focused almost entirely on one angle – race relations.  We’ve heard about unrest in the city, the National Guard, police in riot gear, and danger in the streets.  We’ve heard about the District Attorney’s ties to law enforcement, and concerns that a too-white Grand Jury may be racially motivated not to indict the police officer involved in the deadly shooting. But the media have been strangely silent about a different angle – this comm

Celebrating Larissa Gionfriddo Podermanski Five Years Later

My daughter Larissa died of Metastatic Breast Cancer five years ago, in May of 2018.  She had only two wishes at the end. One was that we plant a tree for her. We did - in a Middletown CT city park - and it has grown straight and tall. The other was that she not be forgotten. Larissa's family and friends took pains to reassure that she could not be forgotten. If you were fortunate enough to know Larissa, you would know why. Still, I wondered how I might celebrate her a little more now that some years have passed, while sharing some of her memorable spirit with others (some who knew her and others who did not), while reminding us why she was such an extraordinary woman. In early 2017, Larissa started a blog called Metastatically Speaking, through which she chronicled her life with MBC. Unfortunately - and through no one's fault - her blog disappeared some time after her death. So, if you search for it now, you can't find it.  However, I was fortunate enough to see and retain

Judgment Day

Ironic. I was not as nervous as you would think on April 23 rd .  Martin, my mother and I drove up to Dana Farber.  All weekend I wanted plan for Poland, Barbados and Florida, as we brainstormed ideas of what could be attainable or possible. I started to realize I looked pregnant… but that couldn’t be. When the appointment began I noticed it felt like a routine visit. Everything went smoothly, but what were we focusing on? It was this: if I did nothing the outlook for me was living three weeks to a few months longer. So, is that my only option, I wanted to know?   No, I was told we can try a low dose chemo and see how it works.   Since it is low dose, they said, it won’t do much harm, but we truly don’t know how it will work. It’s not a treatment we have used a lot at low dose and technically you are in liver failure, leaving you with limited options.   Of course, the goal would still be to get you to be stable; however, this is a blind treatment. We don’t know if this approach w