“In 2011, mental disorders accounted for more hospitalizations of U.S.
service members than any other diagnostic category.” – Armed Forces Health
Surveillance Center Medical Surveillance Monthly Report, June 2012
Recently, my daughter Elizabeth told me about a friend who stopped
in to see her at the mall where she works while attending college. Like her, he’s in his early twenties. They worked together at a toy store a few
years ago, and she hadn’t seen him since then.
He had enlisted in the army.
He was deployed overseas twice, and served a tour in a war zone. He sustained a minor physical injury, now
healed, while serving.
She said that he seemed a little down in the dumps when she
saw him. He told her that he is having
trouble with his relationships since his return, but doesn’t think there’s
anything wrong with him. He’s pretty
sure he doesn’t have PTSD, and sees no reason to seek counseling or other
mental health supports.
Instead, he mostly keeps to himself and drinks a little more
than he thinks he should.
Elizabeth is concerned about him, and should be.
Nearly one million
(936,283 to be exact) active duty service members were diagnosed with at least
one mental disorder from 2000 to 2011.
And, according to
the most recent Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center Medical Surveillance
Monthly Report, both the numbers and rates of service members diagnosed
with mental disorders increased by 65% during the same period.
These just count active duty military personnel who are
diagnosed with a mental disorder. They
don’t include either veterans or the young people who – like Elizabeth’s friend
– have no formal diagnosis.
Mental disorders now account for more hospitalizations among
U.S. service members than any other diagnostic category. Suicide is the second leading cause of death
among active service members (behind combat injuries), and mental disorders are
the third most common reason for ambulatory care visits, behind musculoskeletal
disorders and routine health care.
Between 2003 and
2011, the rates of certain mental disorders with a significant environmental component
soared as our involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan deepened.
- The rates of depression and adjustment disorders doubled.
- The anxiety rate tripled.
- The PTSD rate went up six-fold.
On the other hand, the combined rate of alcohol and
substance abuse and dependence remained nearly the same (alcohol dependence was
lower; other substance dependence was higher), as did the rates of schizophrenia
and other psychoses.
Just as worrisome is that the rates of the more environmentally-influenced
mental disorders have not gone down as we’ve wound down our combat roles. Between 2009 and 2011:
- The depression rate was about the same.
- The rate of adjustment disorders was 10% greater.
- The PTSD rate was 12% greater.
- The anxiety rate was 23% greater.
The surveillance report
noted that all these numbers should be viewed in a broader context – that one
in two adults will meet the criteria for a mental disorder at some point in
their lifetimes.
Here’s the problem with that comparison. There are only about 3 million total OEF/OIF
(Iraq and Afghanistan) veterans and active duty personnel combined. So the “lifetime” prevalence of mental
disorders among the still mostly young people in these groups is already at
least 30% - and could already be much higher.
As Elizabeth pointed out, “If they don’t get help today,
where will they be ten years from now?”
Good question.
So what should we do?
For one thing, we need to beef up mental health services to
both active duty personnel and veterans, including planning the transition to from
military to civilian life much more carefully than we have done in the past.
We might also consider a couple of prevention
strategies. Adjustment disorders are twice
as common in active duty teenagers as in any other military age group. If we were to increase the age of recruitment
by a year or two, we could prevent a lot of these. In addition, anxiety and depression both peak
when active duty personnel are in their late twenties. If we restricted multiple deployments and limited
separation from growing families, we might curtail these, too.
We also need to improve adult mental health services in
general. There are still too many policy
leaders who avoid tackling this problem by pretending that mental disorders are
personality weaknesses.
But when they effectively paint at least 30% of brave, young
active duty military personnel and veterans with this sloppy old brush, the real
weaknesses are the policymakers’—most notably their own denial of reality.
You can read more about service gaps in meeting the needs of veterans by clicking on the names of each of the following columns: Answering the Call, Veterans and Mental Illness, Veterans Dazed Not Dazzled by Mental Health Care, and Iraq and Back.
Where is the boundary between an injury and a disorder? That’s the question raised by U.S. Army officials regarding an all-too-frequent outcome of military combat. Concerned that calling their response to wartime experience posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) would keep soldiers from proper care, Gen. Peter Chiarelli (Ret.) has suggested that the term be changed to posttraumatic stress injury.
ReplyDelete-------------------------------------
psychiatrist in new york