There was some surprisingly good news this month about the
cost of insurance under Obamacare. It
will be cheaper than expected. But it
remains to be seen – will cheaper insurance satisfy Obamacare doubters on either
the left or the right?
I doubt it, but first let’s take a look at the details.
A few months ago, the Wall Street Journal warned of health
insurance sticker shock when the Obamacare insurance exchanges open for
business in another ten weeks.
There could be an up-to-50 percent increase in health
insurance premiums, the Journal warned.
But a report
this month from the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) brought a surprise.
Based on data from the first eleven states reporting actual premium
numbers, ASPE now says that insurance costs for Obamacare “silver” plans for
individuals will be 18 percent lower than originally projected by CBO.
Premiums for the least expensive plans were averaging around
$321 per month – before income-based tax credits were subtracted from those
costs.
And in five states plus the District of Columbia reporting small group plan numbers, insurance premiums for the all-important “second
lowest cost” silver level plans will range from 6 percent to 36 percent less
than they would have been if Obamacare were not the law of the land.
What makes a plan a “silver” plan?
Despite what you might assume from the headlines, plan categories
are not based on insurance premiums.
They are based on the percentage of the total cost of health care that the
plan will pay for everyone in the plan, versus what the plan’s policyholders
will pay out-of-pocket.
There are four categories of plans – bronze, silver, gold, and
platinum. All plans will provide
coverage for the same group of essential benefits. But bronze plans will cover 60 percent of the
cost of these benefits, silver plans will cover 70 percent, gold plans will
cover 80 percent, and platinum plans will cover 90 percent. Policyholders will pay the rest.
This does not mean that if you have a silver plan, at the
end of the year you will have paid 30 percent of your total health care costs
and your insurer will have paid 70 percent.
Those are just the averages, and everyone’s individual experience
will vary from the average at least somewhat.
There are two reasons
that the cost of the silver plans will get so much attention.
The first is that, along with gold plans, they will be the
most widely-available plans. The second
is that the tax subsidies built into Obamacare are based on the projected cost
of the second-lowest-cost silver plan.
But not all silver plans will be alike.
One silver plan, for example, may charge a higher premium
than another silver plan. But that plan
might cover 75 percent of hospital costs, while the other pays only 70 percent.
Other silver plans might be less expensive than some bronze
plans – particularly if they provide less “first dollar” coverage for care – or
more expensive than some bold plans.
But while the premium
costs of the silver plans may dominate the news and public policy analysis in
the coming months, I don’t think that how good you feel about Obamacare is
ultimately going to be based on the cost of a silver plan.
Here’s why.
Deductibles, co-pays, and uncovered health expenses also
factor into how satisfied we are with our insurance.
If you believe that being expected to absorb, on average, 30
percent of your health care cost burden when you already have insurance is too
big a price to pay, then you will not be happy with a silver plan. You will either hope you or your employer can
afford to pay extra for a gold or platinum plan if one is available, or you
will complain as much as you do today about your lousy coverage.
And you will dream again of government-sponsored health care
for all.
Conversely, if you think that Obamacare goes too far in
requiring insurers to cover at least 60 percent of the health care costs of the
people they insure, then you may decline to participate in the system at all
and pay the small fine.
And you will join
Eric Cantor in the march to health policy irrelevancy by asking the U.S
House to
repeal Obamacare for a 40th time.
Paul Gionfriddo via email: gionfriddopaul@gmail.com. Twitter: @pgionfriddo. Facebook: www.facebook.com/paul.gionfriddo. LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/paulgionfriddo/
Comments
Post a Comment