Skip to main content

Florida's Medicaid Millionaires

Florida recently elected to turn down – again – over $2 million in Federal money to pay the administrative costs of expanding its Medicaid long term care program’s home and community based services.

In March 2011, Florida qualified for over $35 million to join most of the rest of the nation in participating in the Money Follows the Person program.  The program was created during the Bush Administration as a way of helping people move back out of nursing homes into the community. 
It became so popular in the 29 states (and District of Columbia) participating in it that it was expanded as part of health reform.  Thirteen additional states, including Florida, were invited to participate.  Former Governor Charlie Crist authorized Florida’s Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) to file Florida’s application.

Rejecting the program means that people who want to leave Florida nursing homes won’t be given control of the resources they need to do so. 


On the other hand, as a result of Florida’s 2011 Medicaid reform legislation, people who don’t want to leave Florida nursing homes may be forced out, and the money will go to managed care companies.

When Florida’s current Governor Rick Scott took office there was some question as to whether he would pursue the Money Follows the Person program.  After saying he would not implement anything in the Affordable Care Act, he changed his mind and said that he would accept the federal money for this program.  He sought approval from the Legislature to draw down the dollars. 

Then, he apparently changed his mind in May, and allowed the legislative session to pass without pushing for the action needed to allow AHCA to accept the money. 
After a strong reaction from the public against this decision, the Governor asked legislative leaders to revisit the issue in late June.  Key Senators cast a bipartisan vote to accept the money, but House members refused on a party line vote.

Though DHHS earlier said that it would leave the door open to Florida for the remainder of the year, this action may finally kill Florida’s participation in the program.
According to an Associated Press article, at least one of those who voted against it argued that Florida did not need to duplicate its existing programs.

But Florida spends only about half as many of its Medicaid dollars on home and community-based services as the national average.  In 2009, AARP put Florida’s percentage at 14%, while the national percentage was 27%.
This would suggest that at the very least, Florida does need to “duplicate” its existing programs.

Another House member correctly pointed out that although these dollars could have lessened the burden on state taxpayers, they were still federal taxpayer dollars.
This begs a bigger question.  Why would Florida’s elected officials not want tax dollars Floridians pay to Washington to come back to Florida to help meet our needs?  Because of this decision, Florida’s share of these federal home care tax dollars is going to be sent to, and used by, residents of 41 other states and the District of Columbia instead of Florida. 

It was a nice gesture for Florida’s state legislators to send $35.7 million to the people of Texas, Arkansas, North Carolina, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Kansas, Iowa, and Ohio, among others.  But they don’t represent these states. 
What they did to the Floridians they do represent was the equivalent of either imposing $35.7 million in additional taxes without adding new services, or cutting $35.7 million in services without reducing taxes.  Either way, Floridians lose.

These home and community-based dollars typically provide for the care of adults with disabilities.  About a third of program participants nationwide have physical disabilities, and about a third more have developmental disabilities.  Most of the people in Florida who would have benefited from the program are among the almost 900,000 Medicaid recipients between the ages of twenty and sixty-five. 
In nursing homes, many will become Medicaid MillionairesThe lifetime cost of their nursing home care will probably exceed $1 million.  So long as they remain institutionalized, there is zero chance that they will ever be able to contribute independently to the cost of that care.

If they were to return home, that picture changes.  People with significant disabilities on the Money Follows the Person program are living and even working in the community again, spending – and sometimes even saving – a little money.  Early evaluation data from the Kaiser Family Foundation also suggest that the program is less costly per person than either nursing home care or other home and community-based programs, like Florida’s.

Nationwide, twelve thousand people had returned to homes and apartments because of the Money Follows the Person program as of the end of 2010.  It’s too bad at least some don’t get to call Florida their home today.  Perhaps they’ll retire here.
If you have questions about this column or wish to receive an email notice when future Our Health Policy Matters columns are published, please contact gionfriddopaul@gmail.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Veterans and Mental Illness

On a sultry June morning in our national’s capital last Friday, I visited the Vietnam Veterans Memorial .   Scores of people moved silently along the Wall, viewing the names of the men and women who died in that war.   Some stopped and took pictures.   One group of men about my age surrounded one name for a photo.   Two young women posed in front of another, perhaps a grandfather or great uncle they never got to meet. It is always an incredibly moving experience to visit the Wall.   It treats each of the people it memorializes with respect. There is no rank among those honored.   Officer or enlisted, rich or poor, each is given equal space and weight. It is a form of acknowledgement and respect for which many veterans still fight. Brave Vietnam veterans returned from Southeast Asia to educate our nation about the effects of war and violence. I didn’t know anything about Post Traumatic Stress Disorder when I entered the Connecticut Legislature in the...

Scapegoats and Concepts of a Plan: How Trump Fails Us

When a politician says he has “concepts of a plan” instead of a plan, there is no plan. And yet, that’s where we are with Donald Trump, nine years after he first launched a political campaign promising to replace Obamacare with something cheaper and better, nearly four years after he had four years to try to do just that. And fail. Doubling down during Tuesday’s debate, he claimed he had “concepts of a plan” to replace Obamacare. Really? He’s got nothing. In fact, he sounds just like Nixon sounded in 1968, when he claimed he had a “secret” plan to get us out of Vietnam. That turned out to be no plan at all (remember “Vietnamization?”) and cost us seven more years there and tens of thousands of lives. The Affordable Care Act, about which I wrote plenty in this blog a decade or more ago, wasn’t perfect. But it was a whole lot better than what we had before it – and anything (save a public option) that has been proposed since. Back then, insurers could deny coverage because of pre-exi...

Anxiety and the Presidential Election

Wow. Could the mainstream media do anything more to raise our anxiety levels about the 2024 election? And diminish or negate all the recent accomplishments in our country? Over the past three-and-a-half years, our nation’s economy has been the strongest in the world. Unemployment is at record lows, and the stock market is at record highs. NATO – which last came together to defend the United States in the aftermath of 9/11 – is stronger than ever. Border crossings are down. Massive infrastructure improvements are underway in every state. Prescription drug costs are lower. We finally got out of Afghanistan – evacuating more than 100,000 U.S. citizens and supporters – with just a handful of deaths. Inflation – which rose precipitously in the aftermath of the pandemic – has come back down, and prices in many areas have even begun to decline. And yet, all the media commentators can talk about these days – and they are not “reporters” when they are clearly offering opinions to frame the...