Skip to main content

Americans Want Medicare and Medicaid Left Alone

It turns out that our health policy still matters to us, which shouldn’t surprise anybody – except a few politicians next election.
A recent Rasmussen poll found that healthcare remains the second most important issue, behind the economy, to our people.  63% say it is very important to them in determining their vote.
And last week, a new Washington Post-ABC News poll was released.
source: Washington Post-ABC News Poll, 4/14-17/11
On the two major health care spending issues of the day – Medicare and Medicaid – the public had surprisingly strong opinions.  And it seems that some political leaders are incredibly out of touch with those opinions.
Only 21% supported cutting Medicare.  78% were opposed, 65% strongly.
Only 30% supported cutting Medicaid.  69% were opposed, 52% strongly.
This comes after an avalanche of political debate about deficits that blame them on Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. 
Many elected officials, led by Representative Paul Ryan, single out entitlement spending as what’s wrong with government spending these days.  They favor deep cuts to health, mental health, and other safety net programs, while favoring tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy.
From the Washington Post-ABC News poll, it doesn’t appear that the people are buying what these politicians are trying to sell.
People who follow the news regularly know that the deficit is as high as it is not because of entitlements, but because of a combination of the Bush tax cuts and Congress’s waging of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan without raising any money to pay for them.
More tax cuts and more wars aren’t going to help.
The poll results show clearly that people do not blame government-run health care programs like Medicare and Medicaid for the deficit.  After all, people recognize that they pay a dedicated Medicare tax on every paycheck they receive, but no war tax.  It’s pretty hard to miss.
So when they were asked how the budget deficit should be closed, 59% of the people said through a combination of tax increases and spending cuts.
Just as there is consensus on not cutting health care, there is a great deal of consensus about where to raise taxes.  72% thought income taxes should be increased on those making more than $250,000 a year.  54% were strongly in support of this; only 17% were strongly opposed.
Interestingly, the Affordable Care Act already contains a provision to add a new Medicare tax on unearned income for those making more than $250,000, but people would like to see regular income tax rates increased on these incomes as well.
Of course, almost 80% of poll respondents had incomes less than $100,000.  It’s always easier to support raising someone else’s taxes instead of one’s own.
However, in this instance, almost half of the people were surprisingly unselfish when it comes to pitching in to help. 
45% said they would support raising taxes on all Americans while making small reductions in Medicare and Social Security benefits to bring down the deficit.  While a slim majority – 53% - opposed this approach, only 40% opposed it strongly.
However, they are very clear that they don’t want Medicare changed dramatically, to a voucher program or privatized.  65% said they want it to remain the way it is today, versus only 34% who want it changed. 
What might be the reason? The Medicare program consistently pays out well over 90% of premium dollars in benefits.  People understand that private insurers cannot match this level of efficiency, and they don’t want to pay more money for fewer benefits, for their parents or for themselves.
Even most of the 34% supporting Medicare privatization change their minds when they factor in the cost increases associated with private insurance.  When asked if they would continue to support privatization if the value of the vouchers didn’t go up as fast as their premiums, 60% said no, leaving only 14% still in favor.
People support their government-run health programs. They want a Medicaid program that will help provide for the long term care needs of elders and people with disabilities, and provide safety net coverage for the poor.
As they’ve become more experienced with private managed care, people have become more skeptical of its benefits.  They don’t want someone making what could be a life or death decision for them or their loved ones based on cost.  And they certainly don’t want this decision made somewhere in a corporate backroom.
When people say “don’t touch my government-run health care,” they’re not trying to hold onto something we can no longer afford.  They’re keeping a firm grip on the one thing standing between many of us and misery.   
To receive an email alert when new Our Health Policy Matters blogs are published, send an email to gionfriddopaul@gmail.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Veterans and Mental Illness

On a sultry June morning in our national’s capital last Friday, I visited the Vietnam Veterans Memorial .   Scores of people moved silently along the Wall, viewing the names of the men and women who died in that war.   Some stopped and took pictures.   One group of men about my age surrounded one name for a photo.   Two young women posed in front of another, perhaps a grandfather or great uncle they never got to meet. It is always an incredibly moving experience to visit the Wall.   It treats each of the people it memorializes with respect. There is no rank among those honored.   Officer or enlisted, rich or poor, each is given equal space and weight. It is a form of acknowledgement and respect for which many veterans still fight. Brave Vietnam veterans returned from Southeast Asia to educate our nation about the effects of war and violence. I didn’t know anything about Post Traumatic Stress Disorder when I entered the Connecticut Legislature in the...

Scapegoats and Concepts of a Plan: How Trump Fails Us

When a politician says he has “concepts of a plan” instead of a plan, there is no plan. And yet, that’s where we are with Donald Trump, nine years after he first launched a political campaign promising to replace Obamacare with something cheaper and better, nearly four years after he had four years to try to do just that. And fail. Doubling down during Tuesday’s debate, he claimed he had “concepts of a plan” to replace Obamacare. Really? He’s got nothing. In fact, he sounds just like Nixon sounded in 1968, when he claimed he had a “secret” plan to get us out of Vietnam. That turned out to be no plan at all (remember “Vietnamization?”) and cost us seven more years there and tens of thousands of lives. The Affordable Care Act, about which I wrote plenty in this blog a decade or more ago, wasn’t perfect. But it was a whole lot better than what we had before it – and anything (save a public option) that has been proposed since. Back then, insurers could deny coverage because of pre-exi...

Anxiety and the Presidential Election

Wow. Could the mainstream media do anything more to raise our anxiety levels about the 2024 election? And diminish or negate all the recent accomplishments in our country? Over the past three-and-a-half years, our nation’s economy has been the strongest in the world. Unemployment is at record lows, and the stock market is at record highs. NATO – which last came together to defend the United States in the aftermath of 9/11 – is stronger than ever. Border crossings are down. Massive infrastructure improvements are underway in every state. Prescription drug costs are lower. We finally got out of Afghanistan – evacuating more than 100,000 U.S. citizens and supporters – with just a handful of deaths. Inflation – which rose precipitously in the aftermath of the pandemic – has come back down, and prices in many areas have even begun to decline. And yet, all the media commentators can talk about these days – and they are not “reporters” when they are clearly offering opinions to frame the...